trump Seeks Private Army Funding From Foreigners?

With a private force, possibly of disillusioned voters, and after the inauguration of Biden, trump may encourage future attacks on Federal, State and City governments. Such a force might be encouraged to attack at his direction.

After his private force destroys Federal, State and local governments, he could proclaim a new government.

That is how Hitler did it; he lost his first attempt but then came back to succeed. See Forbes: [https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimpowell/2013/02/05/how-dictators-come-to-power-in-a-democracy/?sh=67dbe0257ff7]

Several trump minions - Kushner, Wolf, et al - are meeting in foreign capitals now, perhaps they are seeking just such backing. They should be detained and questioned on their return. 

Inauguration Threat

Some of the trump mob has suggested that they WILL attack the Inauguration violently. 

trump announced he will not be there. 

The mob feels no constraint since their leader will be absent.

The plan is clear - attack and disrupt the Inauguration and/or kill Biden and Harris. 

PLEASE prepare..

All trump International Agreements, Contracts or any other Acts on Behalf of the United States are Null and Void.

trump's minions roam the world. We must assume that whatever they do is against the interests of the United States. 

The United States hereby notifies all parties that any such agreement or understanding is canceled until and unless approved by United States' normal process for undertaking such actions.

The United States will prosecute any party, whether in the United States or elsewhere, which commits or conspires to commit an act that violates United States laws. 

Morality Wins Elections in 21st Century

 

Have American voters changed their expectations?

Americans vote differently now than in 2000, IMHO.

Most voters want a higher moral standard from candidates today.

Voters reject candidates who do not meet their expectations and vote for those who do meet them.

Voters will reject candidates whom they expect to fail the code, even though the code is unwritten.

I will try to address some of the Moral Tenets underlying this code, even though it is a precarious task. Others may disagree and wish to add or delete some items - it may be a continuing discussion. These tenets appear to resonate with voters; there are other moral tenets which do not appear to affect voters as deeply.

FINANCIAL GAIN - A candidate perceived as likely to seek personal financial gain from the office would lose the election.

FOREIGN INFLUENCE - Candidates who accept financial or other help from foreign governments or businesses will lose.

MARITAL FIDELITY / PEDOPHILIA - Candidates perceived as likely to cheat on a spouse would lose an election, as will those who support adults having sex with minors. 

RACISM - Overtly or covertly racist candidates will lose. 

SUPPORT DEMOCRACY - Candidates who reject election results will lose.

HONEST BIDDING AND HIRING - Candidates perceived as likely to hire unqualified relatives or award contracts in exchange for graft will lose.

Other commentators may wish to add additional tenets to this list.

Clearly then, candidates who have weaknesses in any of these areas can be defeated by drawing the connection.