Perhaps it is time to reconsider the economic theory underlying monetary
policy. Keynes General theory suggests lowering interest rates will incentivize
businesses to invest and the additional Aggregate Demand will lower
unemployment.
A study of interest rate history questions that assumption:
‘C o n c l u s i o n s
Interest rates
have generally been
high and rising during
periods of rapid economic
expansion and have been low
and declining during
periods of economic contraction. Exceptions have occurred, such as the
unusually high rates
during the first
year of the 1920-21economic contraction,
the sharp upward movement of rates during
the depression in
1931, and the
comparatively low rates
during the period
of heavy demand for
goods and services
during and immediately following World War II.
According
to a popular belief, proper economic stabilization action
calls for relatively
high and rising interest rates
during periods of
rapid expansion, especially
when output is
pressing the limits of productive capacity
and prices are
rising. Conversely, it is generally thought
that lower rates
are desirable in periods
of insufficient and declining demand for goods and services.
According to this
view, interest rates have
behaved in a
stabilizing fashion during
the past half century, except for a few atypical periods.
Proper interest
rate policy, however,
may be much more
complicated than merely
determining that rates are
rising during periods of
strong economic advance and
inflation or declining
during periods of
substantial and rising
unemployment. Questions arise
as to how much interest rates
need to change under various conditions,
what should be
the relation among
rates on loans of various maturities, the
influence of factors other
than monetary actions,
and lags in the
effect of changes in interest rates on
economic activity.’
(Interest Rates, 1914-1965, Norman N. Bowsher,[
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/frbslreview/pages/1965-1969/62472_1965-1969.pdf])
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I think lowering interest rates and printing more money most likely will
not change economic activity without an increase in consumer demand.
Total bank deposits rose to about 80% of GDP in 2008 and have stayed
there. That may reflect a two-tier economy rather than any other economic fundamental.
Recovery requires more spending and less savings.
Units: Percent, Not Seasonally
Adjusted
Frequency: Annual
The total value of demand, time and
saving deposits at domestic deposit money banks as a share of GDP. Deposit
money banks comprise commercial banks and other financial institutions that
accept transferable deposits, such as demand deposits.
Suggested Citation:
World Bank, Bank Deposits to GDP for
United States [DDOI02USA156NWDB], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of
St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DDOI02USA156NWDB, May 12, 2020
Units:
Frequency:
BEA
Account Code: DPCERE
For more information about this series, please see http://www.bea.gov/national/.
For more information about this series, please see http://www.bea.gov/national/.
Suggested
Citation:
U.S.
Bureau of Economic Analysis, Shares of gross domestic product: Personal
consumption expenditures [DPCERE1Q156NBEA], retrieved from FRED, Federal
Reserve Bank of St. Louis; https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DPCERE1Q156NBEA,
May 12, 2020.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
We can expect a reduction in consumer spending as unemployment rises and
millions of families lose incomes. Thus, increasing money supply while interest
rates are at or below the historic Liquidity Preference threshold of 3% will
not do much to stimulate an expansion.
It’s likely that both GDP and consumption will fall together in a new
recession.
It is also likely that a GDP expansion requires an increase in consumer
real incomes. The path to recovery lies in raising consumer incomes through
more worker friendly labor laws, higher marginal tax rates to fund budget expenditures
and other measures to raise consumers’ real incomes above their current level.
No comments:
Post a Comment