Hey Barry:
Maybe there's a way around the Supremes decision that allows corps and unions to spend money in elections without disclosure.
Here's a method to require better disclosure of who actually pays for ads by enacting a state rule. Read it here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/10/19/EDQ01FUCH4.DTL
My memory is that the Reps voted down the law requiring disclosure, but maybe the states can do it on their own.
Your pal,
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment