Hey Barry,
There are actually some rich guys who want to pay more taxes!
Land O' Goshen!
They even have a web site: http://wealthforcommongood.org/
Wonders will never cease, huh Barry.
Your pal,
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Healthcare - 2
Hey Barry, the insurance is literally killin us. 100,000 folks a year die from mistakes in hospitals and the insurance lobby won't even let us talk about it. Thas as many as die in car wrecks, Barry.
You can read it here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/09/MNN9191UIJ.DTL
What the hell, Barry.
Here's a plan for rallies bout health: at every rally there are two folks with a dead relative or big injury caused by the insurance. They each gets five minutes at the front.
Then the free market Nazis can rant all they want. Aint nobody gonna listen to em after that.
Your pal,
You can read it here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/08/09/MNN9191UIJ.DTL
What the hell, Barry.
Here's a plan for rallies bout health: at every rally there are two folks with a dead relative or big injury caused by the insurance. They each gets five minutes at the front.
Then the free market Nazis can rant all they want. Aint nobody gonna listen to em after that.
Your pal,
Stackin Up
So, Barry, you's all dyin to know how you stack up in the popularity polls conducted by yours truly, right?
What I did was to make a you tube video in two parts bout the conomy. Then, I posted it with three different titles: from me, as an answer to Ron Paul and about you - Obama.
Same videos, three different titles.
Naturally I comes in dead last, by a lot: total views 77 with a five star rating.
But, Barry, you's in second - behind Ron Paul by a lot. Holy cow.
Anyways, you totals 114 views with a five star rating.
Ron Paul, well he scores 524 views with a two star rating.
Them econs of yours better git on the ball Barry, we can't have you trailing Ron Paul. That's jes horrible. Ya gotta get some traction on the conomy. We needs it.
Your pal,
What I did was to make a you tube video in two parts bout the conomy. Then, I posted it with three different titles: from me, as an answer to Ron Paul and about you - Obama.
Same videos, three different titles.
Naturally I comes in dead last, by a lot: total views 77 with a five star rating.
But, Barry, you's in second - behind Ron Paul by a lot. Holy cow.
Anyways, you totals 114 views with a five star rating.
Ron Paul, well he scores 524 views with a two star rating.
Them econs of yours better git on the ball Barry, we can't have you trailing Ron Paul. That's jes horrible. Ya gotta get some traction on the conomy. We needs it.
Your pal,
Friday, August 7, 2009
Healthcare
Hey Barry
Bet ya'll worn out from the folks gripin bout them 'po insurances'.
Member them ol newsreels of Hitler youth ya sees on the history channel? Man, all them folks was down with good ol Adolf.
The righty's are like that - 'mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts'. Free markets will fix everything.
Well, thas jes what gave us the bank weasels, and now it's givin us the insurance weasels.
How bout we jes drop insurance althogther and let docs work for the government. Sure as hell be cheaper that way.
I guess ya gotta leave the rabid rightys alone and talk to rational folks with facts.
Keep pushin on it, we gotta get sumthin here, or all my money goes to insurance weasels stead of my sickness.
We loves ya Barry.
Your pal
Bet ya'll worn out from the folks gripin bout them 'po insurances'.
Member them ol newsreels of Hitler youth ya sees on the history channel? Man, all them folks was down with good ol Adolf.
The righty's are like that - 'mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts'. Free markets will fix everything.
Well, thas jes what gave us the bank weasels, and now it's givin us the insurance weasels.
How bout we jes drop insurance althogther and let docs work for the government. Sure as hell be cheaper that way.
I guess ya gotta leave the rabid rightys alone and talk to rational folks with facts.
Keep pushin on it, we gotta get sumthin here, or all my money goes to insurance weasels stead of my sickness.
We loves ya Barry.
Your pal
Monday, August 3, 2009
Clunkers
Hey Barry
Ya'll knows I loves ya and all. but this here clunker thing is exactly whas wrong with us.
Looky, we're in the car biz - we own GM, right? - an now you're after more money from me as a taxpayer for the clunkers so's more folks will be buyin our cars.
It's effin dangerous, thas what.
Jes the same as Hell-burton having Darth Cheney in the White House: 'Course we gotta war on Iraq - my buddies need some biz.'
Holy cow, Barry, get them econs of yours on this, or we're down the drain.
Mind, I ain't sayin it's wrong right now, we jes gotta fix it quick, thas all.
Your pal,
Ya'll knows I loves ya and all. but this here clunker thing is exactly whas wrong with us.
Looky, we're in the car biz - we own GM, right? - an now you're after more money from me as a taxpayer for the clunkers so's more folks will be buyin our cars.
It's effin dangerous, thas what.
Jes the same as Hell-burton having Darth Cheney in the White House: 'Course we gotta war on Iraq - my buddies need some biz.'
Holy cow, Barry, get them econs of yours on this, or we're down the drain.
Mind, I ain't sayin it's wrong right now, we jes gotta fix it quick, thas all.
Your pal,
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Barney's Bill
Hey Barry:
Barney says we gotta get a consumer protection bill so's them banker weasels won't screw us over. Now, them's my words, not his.
Anyways, I think its H.R.627
Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights Act of 2009 (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House). http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c111:3:./temp/~c111B1x6Qi::
So, les push on it, Barry.
Need all the help we can get, here.
Your pal,
Barney says we gotta get a consumer protection bill so's them banker weasels won't screw us over. Now, them's my words, not his.
Anyways, I think its H.R.627
Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights Act of 2009 (Engrossed as Agreed to or Passed by House). http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c111:3:./temp/~c111B1x6Qi::
So, les push on it, Barry.
Need all the help we can get, here.
Your pal,
Monday, July 27, 2009
Limey Econs Apologize
Hey Barry:
Bunch of Limey econs apologized to the Queen for failing to predict the mess.
Read it here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/07/26/international/i063148D68.DTL
So, where's our econs Barry?
OK, they were all Bushies anyways and not about to own up to any bad.
So here's the thing. It's gonna happen again UNLESS we make a plan to make predictions.
An thas what I' doin' Barry - I'm settin up a plan. Workin on a grant right now. See what happens.
Call me anytime Barry, happy to give you credit.
Your pal.
Bunch of Limey econs apologized to the Queen for failing to predict the mess.
Read it here: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/07/26/international/i063148D68.DTL
So, where's our econs Barry?
OK, they were all Bushies anyways and not about to own up to any bad.
So here's the thing. It's gonna happen again UNLESS we make a plan to make predictions.
An thas what I' doin' Barry - I'm settin up a plan. Workin on a grant right now. See what happens.
Call me anytime Barry, happy to give you credit.
Your pal.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Benny's On It
Hey Barry:
Bernanke's workin the problem OK - les just hope the bankers don't steal it all first.
see it here: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20090724a.htm
Your pal
Bernanke's workin the problem OK - les just hope the bankers don't steal it all first.
see it here: http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20090724a.htm
Your pal
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Slippery Bankers
Hey Barry
Man, I told you them bankers is weaselly. Them Golden Sox folks want millions in bonuses.
Like I say, people in hell want ice water, but it ain't gonna happen.
Clamp on em, listen to Barney Frank an good ol Timmy. Timmy, he's gonna be OK.
Anyways, I thinks the new law is this one: H. R. 851 - To establish executive compensation and corporate governance requirements for institutions receiving assistance under the Troubled Assets Relief Program.
If thas it, go ahead an push on it for us.
Thanks, Barry
your pal,
Man, I told you them bankers is weaselly. Them Golden Sox folks want millions in bonuses.
Like I say, people in hell want ice water, but it ain't gonna happen.
Clamp on em, listen to Barney Frank an good ol Timmy. Timmy, he's gonna be OK.
Anyways, I thinks the new law is this one: H. R. 851 - To establish executive compensation and corporate governance requirements for institutions receiving assistance under the Troubled Assets Relief Program.
If thas it, go ahead an push on it for us.
Thanks, Barry
your pal,
Sunday, July 12, 2009
Drainin the Swamp
Hey Barry -
Once I read a coffee cup about real estate, makes sense for you bout now.
'Remember when you're up to your ass in alligators that your goal was to drain the swamp'
Keep on draining that swamp, Barry, we loves ya.
Russia - ya takes the steam outta the talk in Moscow. Keep it up with lotsa committee's, hard to stay pi--ed when you gotta go to a meetin in 2 hours
Muslims, Africa - ya tells it like it is, made things better. Thass the good ol' USA - no BS from here.
Sicko - I'm not real happy bout the insurance cuz it don't actually do nuthin good, so keep on the federal insurance program. We gotta get sumthin outa this, Barry.
Banks ! - Ya gotta keep drivin it, Barry; them bankers are slippery and ya can't let em get away again.
'conomy - ya right, it's gonna take some time, but Barry, them econs of yours ain't said doodly bout what's next. Whassup when the stimulus is done and we still don't got nobody buyin stuff?
'ghanistan - take to 'em Barry, take it to 'em.
Paki's - ya gotta stay on 'em bout the nukes and the talis. no choice but to make that place work right.
Worried bout you Barry - ya already got some grey showin an its only been 6 months. We needs ya, so take care of youself.
your pal
Once I read a coffee cup about real estate, makes sense for you bout now.
'Remember when you're up to your ass in alligators that your goal was to drain the swamp'
Keep on draining that swamp, Barry, we loves ya.
Russia - ya takes the steam outta the talk in Moscow. Keep it up with lotsa committee's, hard to stay pi--ed when you gotta go to a meetin in 2 hours
Muslims, Africa - ya tells it like it is, made things better. Thass the good ol' USA - no BS from here.
Sicko - I'm not real happy bout the insurance cuz it don't actually do nuthin good, so keep on the federal insurance program. We gotta get sumthin outa this, Barry.
Banks ! - Ya gotta keep drivin it, Barry; them bankers are slippery and ya can't let em get away again.
'conomy - ya right, it's gonna take some time, but Barry, them econs of yours ain't said doodly bout what's next. Whassup when the stimulus is done and we still don't got nobody buyin stuff?
'ghanistan - take to 'em Barry, take it to 'em.
Paki's - ya gotta stay on 'em bout the nukes and the talis. no choice but to make that place work right.
Worried bout you Barry - ya already got some grey showin an its only been 6 months. We needs ya, so take care of youself.
your pal
Saturday, July 4, 2009
Look Ahead
Hey Barry -
Here's an idea about economics: think ahead.
Wow, that's what my videos are about.
Now Bill Dudley's gonna say the same thing.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/03/AR2009070302584.html
At least sumbody's watchin'.
Now, Barry, all's ya gotta do is set up a group to make that a systematic program and let me run it or at least work in it, an we're there. If'n ya don't let me help out, I'm just gonna do it myself.
Here's my video links - thanks for watchin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IoQXhuvE-U [video, part 1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yWF3WtUDoA [video, part 2]
http://www.mkeever.com/dodgingdisasters.html [scripts]
How about it Barry, let me help you out.
your pal,
Here's an idea about economics: think ahead.
Wow, that's what my videos are about.
Now Bill Dudley's gonna say the same thing.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/03/AR2009070302584.html
At least sumbody's watchin'.
Now, Barry, all's ya gotta do is set up a group to make that a systematic program and let me run it or at least work in it, an we're there. If'n ya don't let me help out, I'm just gonna do it myself.
Here's my video links - thanks for watchin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IoQXhuvE-U [video, part 1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yWF3WtUDoA [video, part 2]
http://www.mkeever.com/dodgingdisasters.html [scripts]
How about it Barry, let me help you out.
your pal,
Friday, July 3, 2009
Fixin the FED
Hey Barry,
Lotta folks wanna fix the bank mess by changin the FED. Don't know about that. Don't think you can fix the mess by just changin the FED.
Ya gotta shine light on the whole system, not just the darkest corner; otherwise ya just chase them roaches around the room.
Anyways, I give the bill [Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009 (Introduced in House) HR 1207 IH] a big thumbs down.
So, about my videos.
Wow.
Change the title to something bout Ron Paul and they take off like rockets.
So Barry, you gets even bigger numbers, so's I'm gonna change the titles to sumthin bout you.
Don't take it personal. And, don't worry, it'll be clean.
Still love ya,
Your pal,
Lotta folks wanna fix the bank mess by changin the FED. Don't know about that. Don't think you can fix the mess by just changin the FED.
Ya gotta shine light on the whole system, not just the darkest corner; otherwise ya just chase them roaches around the room.
Anyways, I give the bill [Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2009 (Introduced in House) HR 1207 IH] a big thumbs down.
So, about my videos.
Wow.
Change the title to something bout Ron Paul and they take off like rockets.
So Barry, you gets even bigger numbers, so's I'm gonna change the titles to sumthin bout you.
Don't take it personal. And, don't worry, it'll be clean.
Still love ya,
Your pal,
Monday, June 29, 2009
Sneakin Fame
Hey Barry,
OK, so's my videos are getting nowhere fast.
I checked it out and Ron Paul videos get nine hunnert thousand views each, and he doesn't say anything at all. I mean, nothing.
Lemme in on that, so's I called mine an answer to Ron Paul and added some titles.
Catch a star - hell ya.
Here's the links - thanks for watchin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IoQXhuvE-U [video, part 1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yWF3WtUDoA [video, part 2]
http://www.mkeever.com/dodgingdisasters.html [scripts]
I'll let ya know if it works.
Your pal,
OK, so's my videos are getting nowhere fast.
I checked it out and Ron Paul videos get nine hunnert thousand views each, and he doesn't say anything at all. I mean, nothing.
Lemme in on that, so's I called mine an answer to Ron Paul and added some titles.
Catch a star - hell ya.
Here's the links - thanks for watchin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IoQXhuvE-U [video, part 1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4yWF3WtUDoA [video, part 2]
http://www.mkeever.com/dodgingdisasters.html [scripts]
I'll let ya know if it works.
Your pal,
Saturday, June 27, 2009
Laws and All
OK, Barry, you safe from me.
Here I am tryin to save the world an all - only nobody's watchin.
Hell ya gonna do?
Imagine iffn ya has real power and nobody's watchin.
Scary, thas what.
Mebbe I'll just go ahead and make some gripes about the new laws ya'll on about, instead of bein famous. Why not, why the hell not.
Here's one now that sounds real good, just lookin at the title.:
'Financial Transparency Restoration Act (Introduced in House), HR 2727 IH. To provide for the implementation of a system under which each financial institution will report on the financial condition of the institution to the public, and for other purposes.'
Seems this was there before until deep sixed by congress in 1994. Seems like it's shinin' some light on them bankers - Lord knows we needs that.
Here's another one that sounds good, from McCain fer Chrissakes:
'Department of Defense Financial Accountability Act of 2009 (Introduced in Senate) S 1287 IS - To provide for the audit of financial statements of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 and fiscal years thereafter, and for other purposes.'
This'n here should go without sayin, crime that we gotta make a law. Keep track of the bombs and all, jeez - oughta be a no brainer.
Now here's one that just confuses me [now don' you go sayin 'well, doh']:
'Administrative Support and Oversight for Community Financial Institutions Act of 2009 (Introduced in House) HR 2676 IH, To amend chapter 3 of title 31, United States Code, to provide for an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Community Financial Institutions and an Office of Ombudsman for Community Financial Institutions, and for other purposes.'
Jes don' get that one at all.
Keep up the good work, we needs ya up there.
your pal,
Here I am tryin to save the world an all - only nobody's watchin.
Hell ya gonna do?
Imagine iffn ya has real power and nobody's watchin.
Scary, thas what.
Mebbe I'll just go ahead and make some gripes about the new laws ya'll on about, instead of bein famous. Why not, why the hell not.
Here's one now that sounds real good, just lookin at the title.:
'Financial Transparency Restoration Act (Introduced in House), HR 2727 IH. To provide for the implementation of a system under which each financial institution will report on the financial condition of the institution to the public, and for other purposes.'
Seems this was there before until deep sixed by congress in 1994. Seems like it's shinin' some light on them bankers - Lord knows we needs that.
Here's another one that sounds good, from McCain fer Chrissakes:
'Department of Defense Financial Accountability Act of 2009 (Introduced in Senate) S 1287 IS - To provide for the audit of financial statements of the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2017 and fiscal years thereafter, and for other purposes.'
This'n here should go without sayin, crime that we gotta make a law. Keep track of the bombs and all, jeez - oughta be a no brainer.
Now here's one that just confuses me [now don' you go sayin 'well, doh']:
'Administrative Support and Oversight for Community Financial Institutions Act of 2009 (Introduced in House) HR 2676 IH, To amend chapter 3 of title 31, United States Code, to provide for an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Community Financial Institutions and an Office of Ombudsman for Community Financial Institutions, and for other purposes.'
Jes don' get that one at all.
Keep up the good work, we needs ya up there.
your pal,
Monday, June 22, 2009
You Tubing
Watch out Barry,
I'm comin after ya.
Made me couple videos, bad lighting, serious nerves, poor resolution and all that, but ya got competition Barry.
Ya gotta be famous to get traction, so here they go. Here's the links if ya promise not to laugh too loud:
Economics 2.0, Dodging Disasters, Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0m6TlmOISM
Economics 2.0, Dodging Disasters, Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jsTVZemKSA
Here is a link to the video scripts:
http://www.mkeever.com/dodgingdisasters.html
Your pal,
I'm comin after ya.
Made me couple videos, bad lighting, serious nerves, poor resolution and all that, but ya got competition Barry.
Ya gotta be famous to get traction, so here they go. Here's the links if ya promise not to laugh too loud:
Economics 2.0, Dodging Disasters, Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0m6TlmOISM
Economics 2.0, Dodging Disasters, Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jsTVZemKSA
Here is a link to the video scripts:
http://www.mkeever.com/dodgingdisasters.html
Your pal,
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Who's Gonna Make the Loans?
Hey Barry:
So your banker plan leaves them guys with lending, selling stocks and insurance.
OK, I hears you put in a strict regulation that they have to prove they won't go belly up.
But, here's the thing: Who's gonna make loans?
Met a laid off banker veep the other day. Wanna know how she pays the rent now?
She sells partnerships in commercial real estate loans. That's right, she makes the loans the bankers are too busy to make.
We need the loans and we want you to regulate them. But, how's that gonna happen if bankers are too busy with insurance and stocks to diddle with loans?
Am I gonna have to set up a deal with three doctors and a drug dealer to buy a five year old Honda? What the hell.
It's a real question Barry - take a look.
Your pal,
So your banker plan leaves them guys with lending, selling stocks and insurance.
OK, I hears you put in a strict regulation that they have to prove they won't go belly up.
But, here's the thing: Who's gonna make loans?
Met a laid off banker veep the other day. Wanna know how she pays the rent now?
She sells partnerships in commercial real estate loans. That's right, she makes the loans the bankers are too busy to make.
We need the loans and we want you to regulate them. But, how's that gonna happen if bankers are too busy with insurance and stocks to diddle with loans?
Am I gonna have to set up a deal with three doctors and a drug dealer to buy a five year old Honda? What the hell.
It's a real question Barry - take a look.
Your pal,
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Banks on Fire
Hey Barry:
Good on ya for the bank plan. Here's the link: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/reform.pdf
Man, I thought it was never gonna get here.
Couple things, though.
First off, ya gonna want the guys who buy bank stocks watching them banks like hawks. But, Barry, ya got no disclosures in your plan.
Right now, them bankers are like vampires - they only show up in the dark. Ain't good enuf, Barry. Ya gotta shine the lights.
AND, ya gotta watch them bank lobbyists in DC - they'll gut your plans if you let 'em. So, keep on it Barry, or else we'll be here again in couple years.
Don't give an inch - ya gotta be in front drivin on this one. Ya can't just sit in the back seat.
We're countin on ya.
Your pal,
Good on ya for the bank plan. Here's the link: http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/reform.pdf
Man, I thought it was never gonna get here.
Couple things, though.
First off, ya gonna want the guys who buy bank stocks watching them banks like hawks. But, Barry, ya got no disclosures in your plan.
Right now, them bankers are like vampires - they only show up in the dark. Ain't good enuf, Barry. Ya gotta shine the lights.
AND, ya gotta watch them bank lobbyists in DC - they'll gut your plans if you let 'em. So, keep on it Barry, or else we'll be here again in couple years.
Don't give an inch - ya gotta be in front drivin on this one. Ya can't just sit in the back seat.
We're countin on ya.
Your pal,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
The private health industry's time is up
Hey Barry:
Even the Christian Science Monitor supports single payer!
Holy Climolis!
Here's the link: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0616/p09s01-coop.html
Bout time we do it the right way.
Whattya say, Barry?
Your pal,
Even the Christian Science Monitor supports single payer!
Holy Climolis!
Here's the link: http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0616/p09s01-coop.html
Bout time we do it the right way.
Whattya say, Barry?
Your pal,
Saturday, June 13, 2009
Stuck With Insurance
Hey Barry:
Guy says we spend here 50% more than world averages on health care and don't get squat for it.
Where does the 50% go?
Insurance.
Guess we're stuck with 'em.
Sucks.
But at least we get a government option, right Barry?
Your pal
Guy says we spend here 50% more than world averages on health care and don't get squat for it.
Where does the 50% go?
Insurance.
Guess we're stuck with 'em.
Sucks.
But at least we get a government option, right Barry?
Your pal
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Talk To The Terrorists - It Works
Hey Barry:
So here's an expert who says that we should talk to the terrorists.
What an idea. You were right all along.
His name is John Arquilla and he works for the Navy.
Read it here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/02/EDH517TKBD.DTL
Your pal
So here's an expert who says that we should talk to the terrorists.
What an idea. You were right all along.
His name is John Arquilla and he works for the Navy.
Read it here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/02/EDH517TKBD.DTL
Your pal
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Please, Don't Kill Me - Health Insurance
Hey Barry:
So exactly how does insurance make us better, Barry?
It's a big question because nobody likes insurance companies 'cept some of the crooked ones in Congress.
I goes to the doc and I waits while they checks my card - if I'm lucky enuf to have one - then I fill out a bunch of forms that don't do anything cept cover the insurance's ass, then tell the doc my problem and he says he'll let me know if the insurance will cover it or whether I should go to the ER.
Total time in office one hour, total time with doc, 180 seconds.
If its the ER, we're talkin four to eight hour wait for 180 seconds with the doc.
What the hell is that? It ain't workin, Barry. It just ain't workin.
But, you already know that, right?
Everybody in the country wants single payer, Barry, cept you and the insurance. Even most of the docs want it.
I gotta think ya really want it Barry.
So, are you afraid or are you just waitin?
Ya gotta do this one Barry, ya gotta do this one. Single payer. This is why you're there.
Your pal
So exactly how does insurance make us better, Barry?
It's a big question because nobody likes insurance companies 'cept some of the crooked ones in Congress.
I goes to the doc and I waits while they checks my card - if I'm lucky enuf to have one - then I fill out a bunch of forms that don't do anything cept cover the insurance's ass, then tell the doc my problem and he says he'll let me know if the insurance will cover it or whether I should go to the ER.
Total time in office one hour, total time with doc, 180 seconds.
If its the ER, we're talkin four to eight hour wait for 180 seconds with the doc.
What the hell is that? It ain't workin, Barry. It just ain't workin.
But, you already know that, right?
Everybody in the country wants single payer, Barry, cept you and the insurance. Even most of the docs want it.
I gotta think ya really want it Barry.
So, are you afraid or are you just waitin?
Ya gotta do this one Barry, ya gotta do this one. Single payer. This is why you're there.
Your pal
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Better Society: $25
Wow.
A new San Francisco program improves families' lives for $25 a pop.
Read it to believe it: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/05/21/MN0J17O5RJ.DTL&hw=newsom&sn=006&sc=515
A new San Francisco program improves families' lives for $25 a pop.
Read it to believe it: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/05/21/MN0J17O5RJ.DTL&hw=newsom&sn=006&sc=515
Friday, May 22, 2009
Guns and Credit Cards
Hey Barry,
What the hell is wrong with them gun guys in DC anyways?
We both know that some folks is gonna die in the parks this summer. Why do ya go to parks anyway? Ya go to get drunk and stoned - ain't nothing else to do. That's the point, ain't it?
So now some of those effin idiots will have a loaded 45 or AK in the tent. Wonnerful.
Might as well stay home with the gang bangers shootin up the town every night. No point in drivin all day to get shot at - do that at home.
Here's a proposition: give me one of the folks who pushed this law and I'll put him in a car in the hood at night with all the guns he wants. See if he's there in the morning.
Anyways, I can dream.
Good deal on the credit cards, even it it costs a life or two. It's worth it. The life's on the banks, anyways.
Your pal
What the hell is wrong with them gun guys in DC anyways?
We both know that some folks is gonna die in the parks this summer. Why do ya go to parks anyway? Ya go to get drunk and stoned - ain't nothing else to do. That's the point, ain't it?
So now some of those effin idiots will have a loaded 45 or AK in the tent. Wonnerful.
Might as well stay home with the gang bangers shootin up the town every night. No point in drivin all day to get shot at - do that at home.
Here's a proposition: give me one of the folks who pushed this law and I'll put him in a car in the hood at night with all the guns he wants. See if he's there in the morning.
Anyways, I can dream.
Good deal on the credit cards, even it it costs a life or two. It's worth it. The life's on the banks, anyways.
Your pal
Saturday, May 16, 2009
After Them Banks
Hey Barry:
Good on ya. Some moves on the banks, I read and I like.
Bernanke ups the ante on control - that's good.
Geithner goes after derivatives - that's good even tho Congress has to step up.
But, but...we want a better system Barry.
Think about it - bankers just cannot run investments, Barry. Even you said it: repeating the same action and expecting different results is INSANE.
So, Barry, let's get off the nut express and separate loans from gamblers. Don't know about you, but I don't want my little cash stash managed by gamblers and junkies. A little help here Barry.
Your pal.
Good on ya. Some moves on the banks, I read and I like.
Bernanke ups the ante on control - that's good.
Geithner goes after derivatives - that's good even tho Congress has to step up.
But, but...we want a better system Barry.
Think about it - bankers just cannot run investments, Barry. Even you said it: repeating the same action and expecting different results is INSANE.
So, Barry, let's get off the nut express and separate loans from gamblers. Don't know about you, but I don't want my little cash stash managed by gamblers and junkies. A little help here Barry.
Your pal.
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Too Big To Fail - ??
So Barry, I hears lot of gum flappin on the idea that some of them banks are just too big to let go. Well, if some of them banks are too big, then some of the car makers are too big, too. And if they are too big, then what about my cousin's rib joint? Why he's got 100 chairs in that sucker. Course, it's in Detroit, so mebbe he's a goner. No saving cousin Phil, huh Barry?
So riddle me this Barry - just exactly what are the rules about too big to fail, anyway? Where can I read them?
Is it who I know? Or, my skin color? Or, who I pray to??
And, anyway, why not just let them fail, Barry? Sell off the good parts and deep six the bad and there ya go. Been done before.
But, Barry, here's the question: What about the ol' US of A? Are we too big to fail, Barry? What about us?
See, what I'm lookin at is the idea that us workers don't have enuf money to buy shit. We were borrowing, but the payback to them good ol banks runs 30% a year. Screw that.
But, Barry, even I know that if guys like me don't buy stuff, we all done. And, well Barry, I'm damned if I'm goin into hock at 30% any more.
And, Barry, our national credit card to pay for the stimulus, well it's there, ain't it? And it will take a lot of growth to get out of it. Now, growth - it sure as hell ain't comin from me.
So Barry, there's the question: Where in the hell is all this growth comin from?
The only answer I hears is that ya gotta raise all our wages so's we can buy stuff without borrowing at no 30%
Cause, if we don't do that, even the good ol' US of A ain't too big to fail.
Your pal,
So riddle me this Barry - just exactly what are the rules about too big to fail, anyway? Where can I read them?
Is it who I know? Or, my skin color? Or, who I pray to??
And, anyway, why not just let them fail, Barry? Sell off the good parts and deep six the bad and there ya go. Been done before.
But, Barry, here's the question: What about the ol' US of A? Are we too big to fail, Barry? What about us?
See, what I'm lookin at is the idea that us workers don't have enuf money to buy shit. We were borrowing, but the payback to them good ol banks runs 30% a year. Screw that.
But, Barry, even I know that if guys like me don't buy stuff, we all done. And, well Barry, I'm damned if I'm goin into hock at 30% any more.
And, Barry, our national credit card to pay for the stimulus, well it's there, ain't it? And it will take a lot of growth to get out of it. Now, growth - it sure as hell ain't comin from me.
So Barry, there's the question: Where in the hell is all this growth comin from?
The only answer I hears is that ya gotta raise all our wages so's we can buy stuff without borrowing at no 30%
Cause, if we don't do that, even the good ol' US of A ain't too big to fail.
Your pal,
Saturday, May 2, 2009
Riverboat Gamblin
Hey Barry:
Who woulda thunk it? Effin amazin.
100 gold plated economists and we get riverboat gamblin.
Trillion here, trillion there, OK. But, we gotta pay for that.
The only ways I sees us payin is old fashion growth. Ya gotta grow us Barry.
You'se lockin us in to a treadmill. The only way it works is if we just keep on growin.
And, ya know what Barry, that's just how the bankers screwed us up. They made their beds so that if things ever stopped goin up, they were screwed. Then we were screwed.
Them econs of yours better start putting in night hours cuz we got no room for mistakes here Barry.
And, God knows it's real easy to make mistakes.
We're with ya, but ya gotta watch it like a hawk.
Your pal,
Who woulda thunk it? Effin amazin.
100 gold plated economists and we get riverboat gamblin.
Trillion here, trillion there, OK. But, we gotta pay for that.
The only ways I sees us payin is old fashion growth. Ya gotta grow us Barry.
You'se lockin us in to a treadmill. The only way it works is if we just keep on growin.
And, ya know what Barry, that's just how the bankers screwed us up. They made their beds so that if things ever stopped goin up, they were screwed. Then we were screwed.
Them econs of yours better start putting in night hours cuz we got no room for mistakes here Barry.
And, God knows it's real easy to make mistakes.
We're with ya, but ya gotta watch it like a hawk.
Your pal,
Saturday, April 25, 2009
100 days
Hey Barry:
Happy Anniversary. Ya doin good so far -keep it up.
Here's my list of good things for the USA you done so far:
Take on the banks, keep it up
Take on the military contractors - God knows them guys need some comeuppance
Start on health care - can't be done soon enough, keep on the pressure.
Good appointments of people who care about regular folks - labor, vets and all
Keep taxes on the fat cats, that's good. And, I think you want the inheritance tax back, keep on that one too
Let the world know that Bush is gone and the Americans are back - mebbe I can take the Canadian flag off my back pack
No more torture - probably should put the guys who were in charge in jail, but at least our boys will be less at risk now
Out of Iraq - but Barry ya gotta do something about Pakistan's nukes
Good start, Barry, good start.
thank you
your pal.
Happy Anniversary. Ya doin good so far -keep it up.
Here's my list of good things for the USA you done so far:
Take on the banks, keep it up
Take on the military contractors - God knows them guys need some comeuppance
Start on health care - can't be done soon enough, keep on the pressure.
Good appointments of people who care about regular folks - labor, vets and all
Keep taxes on the fat cats, that's good. And, I think you want the inheritance tax back, keep on that one too
Let the world know that Bush is gone and the Americans are back - mebbe I can take the Canadian flag off my back pack
No more torture - probably should put the guys who were in charge in jail, but at least our boys will be less at risk now
Out of Iraq - but Barry ya gotta do something about Pakistan's nukes
Good start, Barry, good start.
thank you
your pal.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Nancy Calls Out Wall Street
Nancy Pelosi calls out Wall Street for a Pecora style hearing to set new rules of the game.
Link: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/16/MNAB1733BH.DTL&hw=pelosi&sn=004&sc=401
Go girl!
Link: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/04/16/MNAB1733BH.DTL&hw=pelosi&sn=004&sc=401
Go girl!
Friday, April 10, 2009
Painting Roaches
OK Barry
You tired of me about banks, I got it. Just one more cuz it's a holiday.
One of my honeydo jobs is to clear out an old paint shed in the back.
Old, ugly and shaky [the shack Barry, the shack]. Plus it has lots of roaches, termites and rats.
DCON does the rats, but the roaches?
You ever cleaned out roaches Barry? Fun job. First ya gotta find the water source cuz them roaches will eat each other all day long and forever so long as there's water around. One time before this, well them roaches would sun themselves in the moonlight on a bright night, they'd rustle when you walk, scurryin away from your feet.
So I found the water source - leaky pipe under the sink - and it was covered with a big ball of white yuck, no roaches in the day, just the white yuck. Took the sink and the yuck and set that sucker in the bright sunlight and it dried up quick. Ya know what, them roaches just walked away after that. Not so much as a by your leave. Sorry for the neighbors, but what ya gonna do?
Now with the new job I got two choices: clean it up right in the light and all, or paint it over. If I paint it over, the wife won't notice til she sees a roach. Maybe by then I can distract her with a trip to her mother's.
Just a thought Barry. We still got your back. Do the right thing.
your pal.
You tired of me about banks, I got it. Just one more cuz it's a holiday.
One of my honeydo jobs is to clear out an old paint shed in the back.
Old, ugly and shaky [the shack Barry, the shack]. Plus it has lots of roaches, termites and rats.
DCON does the rats, but the roaches?
You ever cleaned out roaches Barry? Fun job. First ya gotta find the water source cuz them roaches will eat each other all day long and forever so long as there's water around. One time before this, well them roaches would sun themselves in the moonlight on a bright night, they'd rustle when you walk, scurryin away from your feet.
So I found the water source - leaky pipe under the sink - and it was covered with a big ball of white yuck, no roaches in the day, just the white yuck. Took the sink and the yuck and set that sucker in the bright sunlight and it dried up quick. Ya know what, them roaches just walked away after that. Not so much as a by your leave. Sorry for the neighbors, but what ya gonna do?
Now with the new job I got two choices: clean it up right in the light and all, or paint it over. If I paint it over, the wife won't notice til she sees a roach. Maybe by then I can distract her with a trip to her mother's.
Just a thought Barry. We still got your back. Do the right thing.
your pal.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Bank Fraud; Today!!
Hey Barry:
No time to write, but I can still read.
Check out Bill Moyers on bank fraud at the top:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html
Money quote;
'BILL MOYERS: Yeah. Are you saying that Timothy Geithner, the Secretary of the Treasury, and others in the administration, with the banks, are engaged in a cover up to keep us from knowing what went wrong?
WILLIAM K. BLACK: Absolutely.........'
Ya gotta rein in these guys Barry, no excuses.
Your pal
No time to write, but I can still read.
Check out Bill Moyers on bank fraud at the top:
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html
Money quote;
'BILL MOYERS: Yeah. Are you saying that Timothy Geithner, the Secretary of the Treasury, and others in the administration, with the banks, are engaged in a cover up to keep us from knowing what went wrong?
WILLIAM K. BLACK: Absolutely.........'
Ya gotta rein in these guys Barry, no excuses.
Your pal
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Positively Depressing
Hey Barry:
You lookin' good from down here. Keep workin' those bankers. Hard to believe them guys.
Been quiet from me 'cause the depression just hit and I gotta get a job.
Be back at ya soons I'm workin.
Your pal
You lookin' good from down here. Keep workin' those bankers. Hard to believe them guys.
Been quiet from me 'cause the depression just hit and I gotta get a job.
Be back at ya soons I'm workin.
Your pal
Sunday, March 15, 2009
Outside the Banker's Sandbox
OK Barry, we get that you are trying real hard on a whole lotta things. And, we are hearing your guys about the bank mess. Geithner, Summer, Volcker and all. And I gotta tell ya, on this one, it's a real downer, Barry.
Here's what it sounds like: 'Bankers created the mess and we have to give them money to fix the problem. Of course, we can't go outside the box because we are a nation of laws.'
Don't wanna hear that Barry.
I want to hear that you know what the country needs to get things moving and that you will do that, whatever it is. It may involve new laws, new regulations, who knows what all. Ya gotta focus on the end result and not on the process, Barry. All your guys are process people and that ain't gonna work. I read somewhere that the biggest failure in managing companies is to repeat the process when the results are bad. When the results are bad, ya gotta change the process, Barry. Sound familiar?
Maybe you need special emergency powers to suspend normal laws for a little while. This sure as hell is not normal times Barry. What did FDR do?
If I am there the AIG guys are sitting in my office all day every day until we get a solution. I don't take a letter about how hard it is to change an agreement with crooks.
Maybe we need a banking czar to shake up the nest.
The very least you need is someone to think outside the box, Barry. You don't have that now and we are hurting because of it.
I am available to think outside the box, Barry. And, I'm cheap. Don't need no stinking half million dollars to sit around and make ideas, Barry. Call me any time.
Keep thinking like a father and a husband - don't think like a politician.
We're with you Barry - just don't get snowed.
Your pal.
Here's what it sounds like: 'Bankers created the mess and we have to give them money to fix the problem. Of course, we can't go outside the box because we are a nation of laws.'
Don't wanna hear that Barry.
I want to hear that you know what the country needs to get things moving and that you will do that, whatever it is. It may involve new laws, new regulations, who knows what all. Ya gotta focus on the end result and not on the process, Barry. All your guys are process people and that ain't gonna work. I read somewhere that the biggest failure in managing companies is to repeat the process when the results are bad. When the results are bad, ya gotta change the process, Barry. Sound familiar?
Maybe you need special emergency powers to suspend normal laws for a little while. This sure as hell is not normal times Barry. What did FDR do?
If I am there the AIG guys are sitting in my office all day every day until we get a solution. I don't take a letter about how hard it is to change an agreement with crooks.
Maybe we need a banking czar to shake up the nest.
The very least you need is someone to think outside the box, Barry. You don't have that now and we are hurting because of it.
I am available to think outside the box, Barry. And, I'm cheap. Don't need no stinking half million dollars to sit around and make ideas, Barry. Call me any time.
Keep thinking like a father and a husband - don't think like a politician.
We're with you Barry - just don't get snowed.
Your pal.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Bank Regulation Basics
Hey Barry, good to see you on the trail. Keep movin'.
So I sees you got the big ol' dude Volcker to weigh in on the bank mess. At least he's bigger than Timmy.
But, really, 'Financial capitalism has to change,' or somethin' like that is what he says. Like I hear on my street: "No shit, Sherlock."
Anyways I took a look at the system and Holy Crap! it's really been gamed to within an inch.
It's not rocket science to figure out how to fix it. We have done it before and I did it again here: www.mkeever.com/bank_regulation_usa.doc
No, the hard part's when you make the changes. You will hear screamin', boy howdy, them bankers is gonna scream.
But, Barry, we gotta make them changes. There really is no choice.
Your girls' future is on the line here Barry, don't go chicken on us.
We got your back.
So I sees you got the big ol' dude Volcker to weigh in on the bank mess. At least he's bigger than Timmy.
But, really, 'Financial capitalism has to change,' or somethin' like that is what he says. Like I hear on my street: "No shit, Sherlock."
Anyways I took a look at the system and Holy Crap! it's really been gamed to within an inch.
It's not rocket science to figure out how to fix it. We have done it before and I did it again here: www.mkeever.com/bank_regulation_usa.doc
No, the hard part's when you make the changes. You will hear screamin', boy howdy, them bankers is gonna scream.
But, Barry, we gotta make them changes. There really is no choice.
Your girls' future is on the line here Barry, don't go chicken on us.
We got your back.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Geithner Bombs
Barry, I really love ya. We need you a lot, so keep hangin' in there. Ya doin' all the right stuff.
But Barry, this Geithner guy is not ready for prime time. He is just too small. And, ya need some big guys there Barry, not some limited hack. Seems like a nice enough guy and competent in a limited way, but this here's the future of our country we're talkin' and you need some weight there. Ya need Wilt Chamberlin for cryin' out loud, not some pine warmer.
So, anyways the markets gave the plan a thumbs down and I'm gonna tell ya why.
You guys left out too much, that's why. And here's what you left out.
1. Nationalizing the banks. Ya need to give these bank idiots a timeline to get the lending going. If they don't make it, ya take 'em over, fire the managers and make loans.
I don't mean that you ask them politely for data, I mean that they make loans or get out.
Our national security is on the line here Barry, ya need to get everybody on board.
2. Banks and Investments. Bankers are just no good at making investments. We don't need any more proof, Barry. The Great Depression, the Glass-Steigal act, the Resolution Trust - for cryin' out loud. As sure as God made little green apples, that is something we know.
So, ya gotta create a firewall between bankers and investments. Maybe a new law. Maybe repealing the 1980's deregulation.
Ya gotta do something here and Geithner's not the guy.
3. Unregulated Securities and Banks. Barry, there's a whole bunch of poisonous crap out there and no rules against making more.
Those horse shit mortgage derivative bonds - where's the rule against making more? Nowhere, that's where.
Why the hell not, Barry? Why the hell not?
Unregulated banks - there's a whole bunch of them left over. That can't be Barry, ya gotta get a handle on all the banks. We just can't afford for you to mess this up.
The bankers and the Wall Street guys know they screwed up. And, they expect you to fix it with hard things, not namby-pamby things.
Ya gotta get tough, Barry, we got your back.
But Barry, this Geithner guy is not ready for prime time. He is just too small. And, ya need some big guys there Barry, not some limited hack. Seems like a nice enough guy and competent in a limited way, but this here's the future of our country we're talkin' and you need some weight there. Ya need Wilt Chamberlin for cryin' out loud, not some pine warmer.
So, anyways the markets gave the plan a thumbs down and I'm gonna tell ya why.
You guys left out too much, that's why. And here's what you left out.
1. Nationalizing the banks. Ya need to give these bank idiots a timeline to get the lending going. If they don't make it, ya take 'em over, fire the managers and make loans.
I don't mean that you ask them politely for data, I mean that they make loans or get out.
Our national security is on the line here Barry, ya need to get everybody on board.
2. Banks and Investments. Bankers are just no good at making investments. We don't need any more proof, Barry. The Great Depression, the Glass-Steigal act, the Resolution Trust - for cryin' out loud. As sure as God made little green apples, that is something we know.
So, ya gotta create a firewall between bankers and investments. Maybe a new law. Maybe repealing the 1980's deregulation.
Ya gotta do something here and Geithner's not the guy.
3. Unregulated Securities and Banks. Barry, there's a whole bunch of poisonous crap out there and no rules against making more.
Those horse shit mortgage derivative bonds - where's the rule against making more? Nowhere, that's where.
Why the hell not, Barry? Why the hell not?
Unregulated banks - there's a whole bunch of them left over. That can't be Barry, ya gotta get a handle on all the banks. We just can't afford for you to mess this up.
The bankers and the Wall Street guys know they screwed up. And, they expect you to fix it with hard things, not namby-pamby things.
Ya gotta get tough, Barry, we got your back.
Saturday, February 7, 2009
Soup Kitchens and Banks
So Barry, been helluva couple weeks. Hang in there, you're doin' good.
Anyway, couple weeks ago I double dog dared you to mention some things that get my goat. And you did - you talked about jobs, unions, bad food and pay-to-play. If I had any input into that, I thank you.
Now then, things are gettin' worse quick. Listen Barry: we need soup kitchens now. You saw the Denny's free breakfast deal, right? I mean two hour lines for a free breakfast, for Pete'e sake. Ya, we need jobs, but we need to eat too and there ain't no jobs. Ya gotta do something, people are starving out here.
Here's another thing. The only thing you say about banks is that the CEO can't make more than $500K. Gimme a break willya. Holy crap. $500K. Listen here, I'll run a bank for $25K. Here's my qualifications: I know absolutely nothing about running a bank but I am a bookkeeper. Guaranteed to be a better deal than the current crooks and losers.
I'm so pissed about the banks that I'm running a seminar for some local congress people about how to regulate banks. Trying to get FDIC, FED, SEC and all those guys in a room with the field reps.
Subject is this: what went wrong and how do we fix it.
Stay tuned. I'll let you know what happens.
So, Barry, take it easy and be nice to those great girls of yours.
I'm off.
Anyway, couple weeks ago I double dog dared you to mention some things that get my goat. And you did - you talked about jobs, unions, bad food and pay-to-play. If I had any input into that, I thank you.
Now then, things are gettin' worse quick. Listen Barry: we need soup kitchens now. You saw the Denny's free breakfast deal, right? I mean two hour lines for a free breakfast, for Pete'e sake. Ya, we need jobs, but we need to eat too and there ain't no jobs. Ya gotta do something, people are starving out here.
Here's another thing. The only thing you say about banks is that the CEO can't make more than $500K. Gimme a break willya. Holy crap. $500K. Listen here, I'll run a bank for $25K. Here's my qualifications: I know absolutely nothing about running a bank but I am a bookkeeper. Guaranteed to be a better deal than the current crooks and losers.
I'm so pissed about the banks that I'm running a seminar for some local congress people about how to regulate banks. Trying to get FDIC, FED, SEC and all those guys in a room with the field reps.
Subject is this: what went wrong and how do we fix it.
Stay tuned. I'll let you know what happens.
So, Barry, take it easy and be nice to those great girls of yours.
I'm off.
Saturday, January 10, 2009
What's Wrong With the Proposed Stimulus Package
The President Elect, with respect hereafter 'Barry', called for those who are critical of the proposed stimulus package to offer alternatives. In fact, he says that '...if members of Congress have [a] good idea[s]...that is good for the economy, then I'm going to accept it,' Andrew Taylor AP.
OK, here goes:
'Hey, Barry. How ya' doin'. Kinda stressful right now, I feel ya'.
Me, I'm doin' fine, thanks.
So, Barry, look here, ya know I'm not in Congress, but I got some ideas on me here and I'm goin' to lay them on ya'.
And, Barry, I know you won't take these out of my mouth into your new plan, but I think they're kinda cool, so I'm gonna double-dog dare ya to even mention any two of them. Just so's I know you're listening to real folks.
Ya, Barry, it's a double-dog dare.
First off, here's the hole in your plan. Basically it is trying to fix a roach problem in the kitchen by pissing down a rat hole in the yard. Won't hurt, but won't fix the problem anyway.
See, when I go to the grocery and the gas station I learn some things. Here's what I learn. People are really hurting and sending money to rich folks ain't gonna help me buy gas. You feel me?
I got a cousin at the Community College and here's how he puts it: 'The problem was created as a result of the current system and it will not go away until the system is fixed.
Throwing money at the problem does not fix the system. We need it, but it is not enough'
OK, Barry, here's my laundry list of how to fix the system from the bottom where I live.
Jobs - it's great you want to make jobs, but what if all the jobs go to China? Here's the thing, the fat cats make money from jobs in China. So, fix that. Make it so the fat cats make money from jobs in the USA.
Look, right now we have no rules on jobs in international trade, except we think low wages are better than high wages. So, duh, all the jobs go to low wage countries. Go into a Wal-Mart and find something made in the USA. Good luck with that.
We need to do something, but if we do the Chinese will squeal like a stuck pig. I give a rat's ass if they do, but I know you gotta dress it up. Try this: we can buy as much from China as they buy from us, including T-bills. I even wrote a theory around it, you can see it here: Balanced Trade: Toward the Future of Economics, link: http://www.mkeever.com/essay.html
Even my ten year old niece knows you can only buy as much as you make, so we should know that too.
Banks - we thought we learned in the 1930's for cryin' out loud that you can't trust banks with investments. I want my money in a bank to be safe and not gambled away on some cockamamie horse shit. Their job is to lend money; if they don't do that, take away their license.
And, Barry, I have not heard a single word from you about banks. Ya gotta fix that. And, ya gotta do it right and ya gotta do it quick.
Wages - Any fool can see that the rich are getting way too rich and the poor are goin' down the drain. Why are all the screwy investments around anyway? Simple, there is too much money in the hands of rich people and not enough wages paid to working stiffs like me.
Put another way, the balance between capital and wages is out of whack. That's another thing ya gotta fix. And, Barry, alls I hear from you is 'help the middle class' That's all good, but what about me?
Investments - Speaking of investments, what's up with the SEC sayin' they don't understand an investment? That's just unbelievable. Fix it - no please, just fix it.
Unions - Any fool knows that laws protecting unions have been sold out to fat cats. My cousin got fired just because she mentioned that she wanted an election.
The laws are clear - unions are good for working people. So, Barry, ya gotta enforce them or we might as well move to China or India where our jobs are.
Poisons - We all know that a lot of what we eat, drink and use is poisonous. Our stuff is literally killing us. So, Barry ya gotta fix that. Here's a good place to throw money: hire a bunch of lawyers and scientists to test our stuff and put the SOB's in jail who are killing us. It's not rocket science.
Pay-to-Play - Barry, it's funny that you asked for ideas from Congress when we all know that Congress is corrupt at its core. How in the hell do you expect new ideas from that bunch?? They are all part of the system that makes money from the way things are now. Ya gotta change that and you won't change it if you listen to the people who created the problem in the first place.
OK Barry, I gotta go walk the dog - three point five pound chihuahua and a real kick in the ass.
So, it's a double-dog-dare just to mention the real stuff. 'Cause if you don't fix the real stuff you can't fix the economy. And, if you wanna chew on it, just give me a call.'
Copyright January 2009, Mike P.McKeever, email: mckeever@earthlink.net. Contact author for permission to reproduce in whole or part in printed form, permission hereby granted to reproduce in whole or part in any electronic forum.
OK, here goes:
'Hey, Barry. How ya' doin'. Kinda stressful right now, I feel ya'.
Me, I'm doin' fine, thanks.
So, Barry, look here, ya know I'm not in Congress, but I got some ideas on me here and I'm goin' to lay them on ya'.
And, Barry, I know you won't take these out of my mouth into your new plan, but I think they're kinda cool, so I'm gonna double-dog dare ya to even mention any two of them. Just so's I know you're listening to real folks.
Ya, Barry, it's a double-dog dare.
First off, here's the hole in your plan. Basically it is trying to fix a roach problem in the kitchen by pissing down a rat hole in the yard. Won't hurt, but won't fix the problem anyway.
See, when I go to the grocery and the gas station I learn some things. Here's what I learn. People are really hurting and sending money to rich folks ain't gonna help me buy gas. You feel me?
I got a cousin at the Community College and here's how he puts it: 'The problem was created as a result of the current system and it will not go away until the system is fixed.
Throwing money at the problem does not fix the system. We need it, but it is not enough'
OK, Barry, here's my laundry list of how to fix the system from the bottom where I live.
Jobs - it's great you want to make jobs, but what if all the jobs go to China? Here's the thing, the fat cats make money from jobs in China. So, fix that. Make it so the fat cats make money from jobs in the USA.
Look, right now we have no rules on jobs in international trade, except we think low wages are better than high wages. So, duh, all the jobs go to low wage countries. Go into a Wal-Mart and find something made in the USA. Good luck with that.
We need to do something, but if we do the Chinese will squeal like a stuck pig. I give a rat's ass if they do, but I know you gotta dress it up. Try this: we can buy as much from China as they buy from us, including T-bills. I even wrote a theory around it, you can see it here: Balanced Trade: Toward the Future of Economics, link: http://www.mkeever.com/essay.html
Even my ten year old niece knows you can only buy as much as you make, so we should know that too.
Banks - we thought we learned in the 1930's for cryin' out loud that you can't trust banks with investments. I want my money in a bank to be safe and not gambled away on some cockamamie horse shit. Their job is to lend money; if they don't do that, take away their license.
And, Barry, I have not heard a single word from you about banks. Ya gotta fix that. And, ya gotta do it right and ya gotta do it quick.
Wages - Any fool can see that the rich are getting way too rich and the poor are goin' down the drain. Why are all the screwy investments around anyway? Simple, there is too much money in the hands of rich people and not enough wages paid to working stiffs like me.
Put another way, the balance between capital and wages is out of whack. That's another thing ya gotta fix. And, Barry, alls I hear from you is 'help the middle class' That's all good, but what about me?
Investments - Speaking of investments, what's up with the SEC sayin' they don't understand an investment? That's just unbelievable. Fix it - no please, just fix it.
Unions - Any fool knows that laws protecting unions have been sold out to fat cats. My cousin got fired just because she mentioned that she wanted an election.
The laws are clear - unions are good for working people. So, Barry, ya gotta enforce them or we might as well move to China or India where our jobs are.
Poisons - We all know that a lot of what we eat, drink and use is poisonous. Our stuff is literally killing us. So, Barry ya gotta fix that. Here's a good place to throw money: hire a bunch of lawyers and scientists to test our stuff and put the SOB's in jail who are killing us. It's not rocket science.
Pay-to-Play - Barry, it's funny that you asked for ideas from Congress when we all know that Congress is corrupt at its core. How in the hell do you expect new ideas from that bunch?? They are all part of the system that makes money from the way things are now. Ya gotta change that and you won't change it if you listen to the people who created the problem in the first place.
OK Barry, I gotta go walk the dog - three point five pound chihuahua and a real kick in the ass.
So, it's a double-dog-dare just to mention the real stuff. 'Cause if you don't fix the real stuff you can't fix the economy. And, if you wanna chew on it, just give me a call.'
Copyright January 2009, Mike P.McKeever, email: mckeever@earthlink.net. Contact author for permission to reproduce in whole or part in printed form, permission hereby granted to reproduce in whole or part in any electronic forum.
Sunday, December 28, 2008
Corruption and Regulation
Originally posted October 2008:
Perhaps it was Karl Marx who predicted that the capitalist and communist economic systems would converge someday.
That day seems to be coming closer and closer with recent events trending toward increasing market and administrative regulation in the USA as a capitalist beacon and Russia as the former home of socialism.
In Russia President Medvedev is fighting corruption since he thinks that it hinders economic growth. In the USA, unregulated free market actions have created a financial panic that has created demands for stricter regulation from Democrats, Republicans, CEO's, the SEC and the general public.
Russian Sergey Vadimovich Stepashin, chairman of the Russian Federation Comptroller's Office, has proposed a comprehensive corruption elimination campaign, according to an interview article in the Rossiyskaya Gazeta, September 24, 2008 by Tatyana Panina.
He singled out Russian Law No N94-FZ "On Distribution of Orders for the Delivery of Goods, the Performance of Work, and the Rendering of Services for State and Municipal Needs" as providing opportunities for corrupt behavior.
In the United States, Christopher Cox the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] has blamed a lack of regulation for the current financial crisis. ['S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse', By STEPHEN LABATON, New York Times Published: September 26, 2008]
The question naturally arises: What is regulation? It's an important topic that needs a lot of discussion.
I'll try to provide an overview from a layman's, i.e., not a lawyer, point of view. Perhaps a Western economic student's perspective will be useful - even though it may contain a few legal blunders.
REGULATION OF BANKS AND FINANCIAL FIRMS
In 21st Century economies, banks and financial institutions control part of the country's money supply. Thus, regulating them correctly is a national security matter - poorly or crookedly managed banks can harm the country.
Any firm which manages a part of the country's money supply should be examined regularly by the Central Bank or other appropriate institution to be sure it is being run soundly and honestly.
If the bank examiners conclude that the bank or firm has problems, the examiners should insist that the problems be corrected. Failure to correct the problems will lead to the bank being closed and its assets sold to another bank.
This is a case where separation of powers and extensive processes to ensure fairness to accused individuals can be compromised in the interests of the country.
MARKET REGULATION OF UTILITIES AND MONOPOLIES
In a market economy where most goods and services are provided by private, for-profit enterprises, sometimes firms are granted a monopoly by the state in providing a specific product or service. The economic justification for the monopoly is that the economies of scale compared to the size of the market dictate that a monopoly can be more efficient. In other words, the amount of investment to get the lowest cost is so high that a company will make the investment only if it can get a sufficient volume of business. This usually happens in utilities like electricity, garbage collection, sewer and water systems and so forth.
The economic problem is that any monopoly has an incentive to raise the price too high in order to make high profits. This then defeats the purpose of granting the monopoly in the first place.
Before some deregulations in the USA, many state governments created Public Utility Commissions [PUC's] which regulated utility monopolies. The basic idea is that before the firm can change any price or service level, it has to justify that change to its PUC. Failure to secure approval meant that the firm would be fined the total amount of the inappropriate price or service level. This took away the firm's economic incentive to cheat - what's the point in cheating if you will lose any gain to a fine?
The PUC's based their decisions on allowing a return on investment [ROI] sufficient to attract capital for expansion and no more. If a company needs to pay 10% on bonds or loans to get the money for the expansion, then the PUC allowed a price to be set which made a 10% ROI likely.
In exchange the firm received a safe and steady market but was prevented from risky and possibly more profitable ventures. Investors received a certain income with little growth possibilities. The system worked fine until deregulation.
Most PUC members were elected by voters under their enabling legislation.
REGULATING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR WITH CRIMINAL LAWS
Making regulation effective in preventing bad behavior by individuals requires that the rules are clear, specific and indisputable. After all, a person prosecuted under such a law stands to lose considerable wealth and/or freedom if convicted. He can be expected to mount a vigorous defense.
First Principle - Prevent Bad Behavior
Effective regulation tries to prevent specific behaviors, whether by individuals acting alone or for a company, bureau or government or behaviors by such organizations as a matter of organization policy.
Second Principle - Describe Bad Behavior
This creates a need for a detailed description of each behavior to be prevented. After all, how can a person or organization be accused of behaving badly if the behavior is not listed as prohibited behavior?
It is critical to describe the prohibited acts specifically so that there is little room for judgment. Such phrases as 'corruption' or 'bribery' are too vague to use in a law. Perhaps a phrase is useful such as: 'An individual employee granting an exemption to a legal requirement for an applicant in exchange for a payment of money or goods to the individual granting the exemption.'
In practice, this means that no behavior can be prohibited until that behavior is described and listed as prohibited. So, if taking a bribe for a favor is described and prohibited in a law passed on January 1, 2009, I cannot be prosecuted for taking a bribe on December 31, 2008. Of course, I can be prosecuted on January 3, 2009 for granting the favor that day, assuming that granting a favor has been described as prohibited behavior.
Third Principle - Describe Specific Punishments for Bad Behavior
The instrument which describes behavior as bad will also specify what is the punishment for the behavior. This may be a range of possible punishments, but the range of possible penalties should be specified. Failure to do so creates another problem where corruption can enter: negotiating or bribing away the punishments.
Fourth Principle - Separation of Powers
This is a Western approach; but, it seems to have merit in difficult areas like corruption.
Entities which participate in the identification and punishment of corrupt behavior should be different entities. For example, suppose a criminal law exists which states that a national government bureau employee who takes money or property and provides an exemption for an applicant to the bureau is guilty of a crime and will be fined a sum of money and be fired from the bureau.
Ideally, the national government's prosecutor prepares a case against the employee with all the relevant facts. The prosecutor's office then presents the case to a national government judge who listens to the prosecution and the defense, then makes a determination of innocence or guilt and assigns the punishment.
If the prosecutor's office also has the power to determine the guilt or innocence, the process is more likely to be viewed as corrupt and is also more susceptible to corruption since only one person has to be bribe.
Fifth Principle - Laws Conform to the Jurisdiction
The above example concerns a national or federal law, prosecutor and judge. If the case concerned a city law, then the prosecution would proceed under a city law with a city prosecutor and judge.
City judges cannot prosecute federal crimes and federal judges cannot decide offenses against city laws.
Sixth Principle - Separate Powers Chosen Separately
While one part of the prosecution process can be chosen by one part of the government, the other part should be chosen differently. For example, federal prosecutors can be appointed by the federal government directly, but federal judges should be either elected in a national election or appointed by the government subject to confirmation by the legislature.
Seventh Principle - Consumer/Worker Lawsuits
As an additional check on institutional abuses, consumers and workers are allowed to sue for damages. If this power is weakened, then regulations before the fact of abuse become even more important.
Perhaps it was Karl Marx who predicted that the capitalist and communist economic systems would converge someday.
That day seems to be coming closer and closer with recent events trending toward increasing market and administrative regulation in the USA as a capitalist beacon and Russia as the former home of socialism.
In Russia President Medvedev is fighting corruption since he thinks that it hinders economic growth. In the USA, unregulated free market actions have created a financial panic that has created demands for stricter regulation from Democrats, Republicans, CEO's, the SEC and the general public.
Russian Sergey Vadimovich Stepashin, chairman of the Russian Federation Comptroller's Office, has proposed a comprehensive corruption elimination campaign, according to an interview article in the Rossiyskaya Gazeta, September 24, 2008 by Tatyana Panina.
He singled out Russian Law No N94-FZ "On Distribution of Orders for the Delivery of Goods, the Performance of Work, and the Rendering of Services for State and Municipal Needs" as providing opportunities for corrupt behavior.
In the United States, Christopher Cox the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] has blamed a lack of regulation for the current financial crisis. ['S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse', By STEPHEN LABATON, New York Times Published: September 26, 2008]
The question naturally arises: What is regulation? It's an important topic that needs a lot of discussion.
I'll try to provide an overview from a layman's, i.e., not a lawyer, point of view. Perhaps a Western economic student's perspective will be useful - even though it may contain a few legal blunders.
REGULATION OF BANKS AND FINANCIAL FIRMS
In 21st Century economies, banks and financial institutions control part of the country's money supply. Thus, regulating them correctly is a national security matter - poorly or crookedly managed banks can harm the country.
Any firm which manages a part of the country's money supply should be examined regularly by the Central Bank or other appropriate institution to be sure it is being run soundly and honestly.
If the bank examiners conclude that the bank or firm has problems, the examiners should insist that the problems be corrected. Failure to correct the problems will lead to the bank being closed and its assets sold to another bank.
This is a case where separation of powers and extensive processes to ensure fairness to accused individuals can be compromised in the interests of the country.
MARKET REGULATION OF UTILITIES AND MONOPOLIES
In a market economy where most goods and services are provided by private, for-profit enterprises, sometimes firms are granted a monopoly by the state in providing a specific product or service. The economic justification for the monopoly is that the economies of scale compared to the size of the market dictate that a monopoly can be more efficient. In other words, the amount of investment to get the lowest cost is so high that a company will make the investment only if it can get a sufficient volume of business. This usually happens in utilities like electricity, garbage collection, sewer and water systems and so forth.
The economic problem is that any monopoly has an incentive to raise the price too high in order to make high profits. This then defeats the purpose of granting the monopoly in the first place.
Before some deregulations in the USA, many state governments created Public Utility Commissions [PUC's] which regulated utility monopolies. The basic idea is that before the firm can change any price or service level, it has to justify that change to its PUC. Failure to secure approval meant that the firm would be fined the total amount of the inappropriate price or service level. This took away the firm's economic incentive to cheat - what's the point in cheating if you will lose any gain to a fine?
The PUC's based their decisions on allowing a return on investment [ROI] sufficient to attract capital for expansion and no more. If a company needs to pay 10% on bonds or loans to get the money for the expansion, then the PUC allowed a price to be set which made a 10% ROI likely.
In exchange the firm received a safe and steady market but was prevented from risky and possibly more profitable ventures. Investors received a certain income with little growth possibilities. The system worked fine until deregulation.
Most PUC members were elected by voters under their enabling legislation.
REGULATING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR WITH CRIMINAL LAWS
Making regulation effective in preventing bad behavior by individuals requires that the rules are clear, specific and indisputable. After all, a person prosecuted under such a law stands to lose considerable wealth and/or freedom if convicted. He can be expected to mount a vigorous defense.
First Principle - Prevent Bad Behavior
Effective regulation tries to prevent specific behaviors, whether by individuals acting alone or for a company, bureau or government or behaviors by such organizations as a matter of organization policy.
Second Principle - Describe Bad Behavior
This creates a need for a detailed description of each behavior to be prevented. After all, how can a person or organization be accused of behaving badly if the behavior is not listed as prohibited behavior?
It is critical to describe the prohibited acts specifically so that there is little room for judgment. Such phrases as 'corruption' or 'bribery' are too vague to use in a law. Perhaps a phrase is useful such as: 'An individual employee granting an exemption to a legal requirement for an applicant in exchange for a payment of money or goods to the individual granting the exemption.'
In practice, this means that no behavior can be prohibited until that behavior is described and listed as prohibited. So, if taking a bribe for a favor is described and prohibited in a law passed on January 1, 2009, I cannot be prosecuted for taking a bribe on December 31, 2008. Of course, I can be prosecuted on January 3, 2009 for granting the favor that day, assuming that granting a favor has been described as prohibited behavior.
Third Principle - Describe Specific Punishments for Bad Behavior
The instrument which describes behavior as bad will also specify what is the punishment for the behavior. This may be a range of possible punishments, but the range of possible penalties should be specified. Failure to do so creates another problem where corruption can enter: negotiating or bribing away the punishments.
Fourth Principle - Separation of Powers
This is a Western approach; but, it seems to have merit in difficult areas like corruption.
Entities which participate in the identification and punishment of corrupt behavior should be different entities. For example, suppose a criminal law exists which states that a national government bureau employee who takes money or property and provides an exemption for an applicant to the bureau is guilty of a crime and will be fined a sum of money and be fired from the bureau.
Ideally, the national government's prosecutor prepares a case against the employee with all the relevant facts. The prosecutor's office then presents the case to a national government judge who listens to the prosecution and the defense, then makes a determination of innocence or guilt and assigns the punishment.
If the prosecutor's office also has the power to determine the guilt or innocence, the process is more likely to be viewed as corrupt and is also more susceptible to corruption since only one person has to be bribe.
Fifth Principle - Laws Conform to the Jurisdiction
The above example concerns a national or federal law, prosecutor and judge. If the case concerned a city law, then the prosecution would proceed under a city law with a city prosecutor and judge.
City judges cannot prosecute federal crimes and federal judges cannot decide offenses against city laws.
Sixth Principle - Separate Powers Chosen Separately
While one part of the prosecution process can be chosen by one part of the government, the other part should be chosen differently. For example, federal prosecutors can be appointed by the federal government directly, but federal judges should be either elected in a national election or appointed by the government subject to confirmation by the legislature.
Seventh Principle - Consumer/Worker Lawsuits
As an additional check on institutional abuses, consumers and workers are allowed to sue for damages. If this power is weakened, then regulations before the fact of abuse become even more important.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
US National Security
Back in March of 2007, I wrote a list of nine areas that are critical to the future national security of the United States.
Now is the time to revisit the list, shown in order with the biggest threat listed first.
1. Political corruption - the government of the USA is corrupt. The legislative system requires that candidates raise money from rich interests to be elected; then the elected legislators grant favors to their campaign contributors.
The national security suffers when only money interests receive favorable laws.
2. Military/Industrial Complex - Contractors receive money from providing products and services to the armed forces. With that money they influence policy to encourage wars.
Our national security is damaged by public wars for private gain. Our military is corrupted when wars are started or encouraged by companies who profit from a war.
3. Energy - Oil interests damage the national security by promoting our dependence on oil.
We simply must reduce our oil dependence - there is no alternative.
A bill was proposed in 2007 in the House of Representatives to fund searches for oil alternatives. This is a good idea.
Here's another: let's treat oil like a public utility. After all, everyone needs it, just like water and electricity. So let's create a national oil commission that will plan for energy alternatives and regulate the price of oil so that oil companies can earn a reasonable rate of return but not any excessive profits.
Failure to deal with our energy problem will damage our future security.
4. Labor and Consumer Unions - Corruption favors business interests over workers and consumers. It is time to restore a more equal balance between labor and business and consumers.
Continued weakening of labor and consumer power will damage the working family, the backbone of America.
A case can be made that all the laws which favor capital creation should be weakened and all the laws which promote higher wages and more jobs should be made stronger. Our national security depends on a strong economy and the economy depends on consumers having enough income to buy products.
5. Income and wealth Disparity - we are becoming a two tier country; the middle class is becoming weaker.
Our idea has been that Americans are mostly middle class. Losing the middle class will damage our long term security.
6. Elections - The foundation of the American idea is that voters can change the government if it is unresponsive. But, if the voting process is manipulated for partisan purposes or private gain, our security is damaged.
7. Judicial Independence - Judges must be above politics to protect our values.
8. [Was 9] Financial Regulation [was Usury]
Unregulated banks have caused the current mess. We cannot tolerate cowboy capitalism.
9. [was 8] Trade Deficits - trade deficits reflect an economic imbalance that will eventually damage the American way of life.
A word about climate change - it is a global problem, not just a US problem, so is not listed here.
Now is the time to revisit the list, shown in order with the biggest threat listed first.
1. Political corruption - the government of the USA is corrupt. The legislative system requires that candidates raise money from rich interests to be elected; then the elected legislators grant favors to their campaign contributors.
The national security suffers when only money interests receive favorable laws.
2. Military/Industrial Complex - Contractors receive money from providing products and services to the armed forces. With that money they influence policy to encourage wars.
Our national security is damaged by public wars for private gain. Our military is corrupted when wars are started or encouraged by companies who profit from a war.
3. Energy - Oil interests damage the national security by promoting our dependence on oil.
We simply must reduce our oil dependence - there is no alternative.
A bill was proposed in 2007 in the House of Representatives to fund searches for oil alternatives. This is a good idea.
Here's another: let's treat oil like a public utility. After all, everyone needs it, just like water and electricity. So let's create a national oil commission that will plan for energy alternatives and regulate the price of oil so that oil companies can earn a reasonable rate of return but not any excessive profits.
Failure to deal with our energy problem will damage our future security.
4. Labor and Consumer Unions - Corruption favors business interests over workers and consumers. It is time to restore a more equal balance between labor and business and consumers.
Continued weakening of labor and consumer power will damage the working family, the backbone of America.
A case can be made that all the laws which favor capital creation should be weakened and all the laws which promote higher wages and more jobs should be made stronger. Our national security depends on a strong economy and the economy depends on consumers having enough income to buy products.
5. Income and wealth Disparity - we are becoming a two tier country; the middle class is becoming weaker.
Our idea has been that Americans are mostly middle class. Losing the middle class will damage our long term security.
6. Elections - The foundation of the American idea is that voters can change the government if it is unresponsive. But, if the voting process is manipulated for partisan purposes or private gain, our security is damaged.
7. Judicial Independence - Judges must be above politics to protect our values.
8. [Was 9] Financial Regulation [was Usury]
Unregulated banks have caused the current mess. We cannot tolerate cowboy capitalism.
9. [was 8] Trade Deficits - trade deficits reflect an economic imbalance that will eventually damage the American way of life.
A word about climate change - it is a global problem, not just a US problem, so is not listed here.
Obama's Economic Thinking
So far the thinking of the new economic team is seriously disappointing.
They are reported to have reached out to divergent economists who [wait for it..........] all agree that the stimulus is needed.
So, mainstream economists call other mainstream economists to solve a problem created by mainstream economics. That is just dumb.
The reason we are in this mess is that mainstream economic thinking is wrong. Even Bush understands the mainstream: 'Free people, free markets, free trade.' This is the same thinking that gave us the Great Depression.
It's also the thinking that gave us Enron, the mortgage meltdown and a severe recession tetering on depression.
Throwing money at the problem - - the Obama solution - without examining the framework is a prescription for disaster.
Even in mainstream, textbook economics, monetary policy - throwing money at the problem - does not work unless people want to borrow.
Nobody wants to borrow now and even the few who do want to borrow can't.
Here's the problem: everyone is convinced that the economy will become worse, not better.
Here's the solution: convince people that the economy will get better.
Here's how to do that: point by point, list each situation in the economic framework that has contributed to the problem, Then list each action to be taken and how it will correct that one particular situation.
For example:
Problem: bonds based on sub-prime loans have tanked and frightened bond buyers.
Solution: no bonds based on mortgages will be offered for sale without a rigorous examination of the mortgages which underlie the bond, with the examination's results published in the bond prospectus and verified by an outside regulator. This is not rocket science, it's very similar to the disclosure the SEC used to require for any security.
Problem: rising unemployment.
Solution: reconfigure national labor laws so that the creation of jobs is favored over the creation of capital. There is a real concern that there is already too much capital in the world and not enough jobs.
For details, see the discussion of the jobs theory of economic growth here: http://www.mkeever.com/apply.html
************************
Don't any of these people read economic history??
They are reported to have reached out to divergent economists who [wait for it..........] all agree that the stimulus is needed.
So, mainstream economists call other mainstream economists to solve a problem created by mainstream economics. That is just dumb.
The reason we are in this mess is that mainstream economic thinking is wrong. Even Bush understands the mainstream: 'Free people, free markets, free trade.' This is the same thinking that gave us the Great Depression.
It's also the thinking that gave us Enron, the mortgage meltdown and a severe recession tetering on depression.
Throwing money at the problem - - the Obama solution - without examining the framework is a prescription for disaster.
Even in mainstream, textbook economics, monetary policy - throwing money at the problem - does not work unless people want to borrow.
Nobody wants to borrow now and even the few who do want to borrow can't.
Here's the problem: everyone is convinced that the economy will become worse, not better.
Here's the solution: convince people that the economy will get better.
Here's how to do that: point by point, list each situation in the economic framework that has contributed to the problem, Then list each action to be taken and how it will correct that one particular situation.
For example:
Problem: bonds based on sub-prime loans have tanked and frightened bond buyers.
Solution: no bonds based on mortgages will be offered for sale without a rigorous examination of the mortgages which underlie the bond, with the examination's results published in the bond prospectus and verified by an outside regulator. This is not rocket science, it's very similar to the disclosure the SEC used to require for any security.
Problem: rising unemployment.
Solution: reconfigure national labor laws so that the creation of jobs is favored over the creation of capital. There is a real concern that there is already too much capital in the world and not enough jobs.
For details, see the discussion of the jobs theory of economic growth here: http://www.mkeever.com/apply.html
************************
Don't any of these people read economic history??
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Mark-To-Market
One of the problems today is that banks are reluctant to lend to other banks, seemingly so because they are unsure of the borrowing bank's financial status.
One of the reasons for that caution is that the borrowing bank's balance sheet may be too weak to support the new loan. If so, one of the probable causes is the required write down of assets to their current estimated values from the acquisition value.
The Accounting Principles Board is responsible for this requirement which was installed after the Enron debacle.
Before then, a corporation simply amortized its losses over some period of years, maybe five years.
That way, the company could borrow again - provided it had adequate cash flow - and continue to survive.
In this emergency, both the new administration and the APB should consider an adjustment with protections to the mark to market requirement. A change here would help the credit markets flow again.
One of the reasons for that caution is that the borrowing bank's balance sheet may be too weak to support the new loan. If so, one of the probable causes is the required write down of assets to their current estimated values from the acquisition value.
The Accounting Principles Board is responsible for this requirement which was installed after the Enron debacle.
Before then, a corporation simply amortized its losses over some period of years, maybe five years.
That way, the company could borrow again - provided it had adequate cash flow - and continue to survive.
In this emergency, both the new administration and the APB should consider an adjustment with protections to the mark to market requirement. A change here would help the credit markets flow again.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

