United States Flag in Distress

United States Flag in Distress
We are not OK

Family Crest

Family Crest
Motto: I will never forget. [ Source HouseofNames ]

HUMANITY DOOMSDAY CLOCK - Moves forward to 2125 due to election of US President trump.

Estimate of the time that Humanity will go extinct or civilization will collapse. The HUMANITY DOOMSDAY CLOCK moves forward to 2125 due to US President trump's abandonment of climate change goals. Clock moved to 90 seconds to doom at December 2023. Apologies to Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists for using the name.

PLEASE QUOTE, COPY and LINK

While this material is copyrighted, you are hereby granted permission and encouraged to copy and paste any excerpt and/or complete statement from any entry on this blog into any form you choose. In return, please provide explicit credit to this source and a link or URL to the publication. Email links to mckeever.mp@gmail.com

You may also wish to read and quote from these groundbreaking essays on economic topics with the same permission outlined above

The Jobs Theory of Growth [https://miepa.net/apply.html]

Moral Economics [https://miepa.net/moral.html]

Balanced Trade [https://miepa.net/essay.html]

There Are Alternatives to Free Market Capitalism [https://miepa.net/taa.html]

Specific Country Economic Policy Analyses - More Than 50 Countries from Argentina to Yemen [https://miepa.net/]




Translate

Friday, February 7, 2020

America’s WALL OF SHAME



America’s WALL OF SHAME

The Constitution of the United States of America was written by men who lived under a tyranny and knew it intimately. They designed the Constitution as an experimental, new way to prevent any person from becoming a tyrant.

The essential element of the Constitution which attempts to control nascent tyrants is that no person is immune from the law. Even though the office of President was granted large power and discretion, illegal acts by the sitting President are subject to review by Congress and by an impeachment trial if the House thinks it appropriate.

Now, in 2020, the Constitution is under attack from outside tyrants including Vladimir Putin who wish to weaken or destroy the mechanisms in the Constitution which prevent tyrants from taking power.

For the first time since its adoption on June 21, 1788, several native born American citizens are supporting those destructive efforts with the powers at their disposal. These American citizens create and maintain the WALL OF SHAME in order to shield trump from accountability for his crimes.  

The phrase ‘Wall of Shame’ was coined by West Berlin Mayor Willy Brandt to refer to the physical wall that kept East Germans from traveling to West Berlin. The phrase has been used several times since, mostly to refer to actual physical walls. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_of_Shame]

The WALL OF SHAME referred to here is neither a physical wall nor brick and mortar nor reinforced concrete; it is much stronger than that.

America’s WALL OF SHAME is forged in the minds of the men who serve trump from their raw emotions of fear, greed and anger. This WALL enables a corrupt administration to hide behind it and to perform crimes and outrages with no fear of punishment.

America’s WALL OF SHAME allows illegal acts to flourish with no oversight – exactly the malaise the Constitution was designed to prevent. They are free to openly flout the Rule of Law and to punish critics like Alexander Vindman and Marie Yovanovitch, steal from the public Treasury, appoint relatives with no experience into positions of trust and authority, overturn military trials and generally use the powers of the United States to further their personal interests at the expanse of the Public Interest.

Here is a partial list of the men and their offices who build and maintain America’s WALL OF SHAME

1.      Criminal businessman and criminally corrupt and impeached office holder, Donald John Trump.

2.      KGB assassin and President of Russia, Vladimir Putin [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_journalists_killed_in_Russia]

3.      The Republican United States Senators who blocked evidence and witnesses during trump’s Impeachment Trial and then voted him acquitted after hearing no testimony nor seeing any documents. [https://www.npr.org/2020/02/05/801429948/not-guilty-trump-acquitted-on-2-articles-of-impeachment-as-historic-trial-closes]

4.      Attorney General William Barr who sequestered the Mueller report and denied its conclusions while preventing its public examination and then issued an order forbidding any DOJ investigations of political campaigns unless approved by him, effectively allowing further foreign interference in American elections. [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/barr-says-no-investigations-2020-candidates-campaigns-without-his-approval-n1131836?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma]

5.      McConnell, Mitch, U. S. Senator, Senate Majority Leader - Vows to block any expansion of Medicare and Medicaid to US citizens, submitted by  Bob Fisher April 11, 2019.’Mitch McConnell let slip the GOP's true health care agenda on Fox News today: "Medicare for all? Not as long as I'm majority leader. It ought to be called Medicare for none." MEDICARE FOR NONE... Fox even slapped Mitch's new slogan onto the Fox News chyron. This photo should be following the GOP around for the next couple of years.

6.      Steven Miller, White nationalist, Imigration adviser to trump, architect of cruel and deadly United States Immigration Policies. [https://americasvoice.org/blog/who-is-stephen-miller/]

7.      Pat Cippilone, trump attorney who was present at meeting when trump told Bolton to pressure Ukraine for Biden investigation, then denies there was any pressure in Senate trial. An ethics violation and may be a crime. [https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-lead-attorney-in-impeachment-trial-could-also-be-witness-2020-1]

8.      Jay Sekulow, trump attorney who is paid millions from Charity ACLJ. A half dozen lawyers employed by the non-profit ACLJ are named in recent Senate legal briefs as members of Trump’s defense team — including one of Sekulow’s sons. The ACLJ, as a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization, is barred under IRS rules from engaging in partisan political activities. [https://fortune.com/2020/01/31/jay-sekulow-trump-lawyer/]


9.      Accused Criminal Rudy Giuliani, trump attorney and political errand boy. [https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/24/rudy-giuliani-jail-056570]

Paul, Rand, United States Senator, criminally identifies whistleblower in public, thereby making it less likely that others will come forward and perhaps encouraging cowards to kill the person identified. [https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/whistleblower-expert-rand-pauls-retaliatory-outing-of-alleged-ukraine-whistleblower-was-criminal/?fbclid=IwAR0IAvKcG4buHEwrHcfDK9s9ZkFXsHeaqkqmsFJTivPbw7ma7eyJ_z1y1os]
l
Len Blavatnik: 'Aside from the large sums of campaign cash doled out to leading Republicans, Blavatnik has largely been considered problematic by the media and Beltway establishment because of his documented ties to Vladimir Putin and the Russian leader’s inner circle.' Now he is funding Buttigieg according to [https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/pete-buttigieg-funded-by-russian-linked-oligarch-who-supports-trump-and-mcconnell/?fbclid=IwAR06AUZIFlmG1hpmIgdPk7XSiinT7zxg7hndMUmraN9gn3XOTXxIGTmvKzI]

The list of WALL builders can go on and readers are invited to suggest additional candidates via the comments section below.

The cumulative effect of this WALL is to damage and possibly destroy the legal foundation of the United States of America. This site will gather published articles and statements from first hand participants as a compilation of previously published or disclosed statements which discuss the actors and actions which subvert the Constitution. It will attempt to describe actions which have the effect of undermining the Constitution. Actions which weaken the rule of law will be discussed whether they result of the action is a personal gain for an individual or a broader harm to the rule of law.

While some of the actions may be determined by others to be criminal, this site makes no such determination. If there is a criminal action discussed here, the site will rely on law enforcement to bring any criminal charges. This site does not make any new accusations nor does it endorse or validate in any way the nature of the accusations discussed here.

Saturday, February 1, 2020

Enabling Act of 1933



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_Act_of_1933


Hitler's Reichstag speech promoting the bill was delivered at the Kroll Opera House, following the Reichstag fire.

The Enabling Act (German: Ermächtigungsgesetz) of 1933, formally titled Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich ("Law to Remedy the Distress of People and Reich"),[1] was an amendment to the Weimar Constitution[citation needed] that gave the German Cabinet—in effect, Chancellor the power to enact laws without the involvement of the Reichstag. The Enabling Act gave Hitler plenary powers and followed on the heels of the Reichstag Fire Decree, which had abolished most civil liberties and transferred state powers to the Reich government. The combined effect of the two laws was to transform Hitler's government into a legal dictatorship. 

The act passed in both the Reichstag and Reichsrat on 23 March 1933,[2][3][4] and was signed by President Paul von Hindenburg later that day. The act stated that it was to last four years unless renewed by the Reichstag, which occurred twice. 

The law was enacted by the Reichstag (meeting at the Kroll Opera House), where non-Nazi members were surrounded and threatened by members of the SA and the SS. The Communists had already been repressed and were not allowed to be present or to vote, and some Social Democrats were kept away as well. In the end most of those present voted for the act, except for the Social Democrats, who voted against it.[5] 

Background

After being appointed Chancellor of Germany on 30 January 1933, Hitler asked President von Hindenburg to dissolve the Reichstag. A general election was scheduled for 5 March 1933. A secret meeting was held between Hitler and 20 to 25 industrialists at the official residence of Hermann Göring in the Reichstag Presidential Palace, aimed at financing the election campaign of the Nazi Party.[6][7] 

The burning of the Reichstag, depicted by the Nazis as the beginning of a communist revolution, resulted in the presidential Reichstag Fire Decree, which among other things suspended freedom of press and habeas corpus rights just five days before the election. Hitler used the decree to have the Communist Party's offices raided and its representatives arrested, effectively eliminating them as a political force. 

Although they received five million more votes than in the previous election, the Nazis failed to gain an absolute majority in parliament, and depended on the 8% of seats won by their coalition partner, the German National People's Party, to reach 52% in total. 

To free himself from this dependency, Hitler had the cabinet, in its first post-election meeting on 15 March, draw up plans for an Enabling Act which would give the cabinet legislative power for four years. The Nazis devised the Enabling Act to gain complete political power without the need of the support of a majority in the Reichstag and without the need to bargain with their coalition partners. 

Preparations and negotiations

The Enabling Act allowed the cabinet to enact legislation, including laws deviating from or altering the constitution, without the consent of the Reichstag. Because this law allowed for departures from the constitution, it was itself considered a constitutional amendment. Thus, its passage required the support of two-thirds of those deputies who were present and voting. A quorum of two-thirds of the entire Reichstag was required to be present in order to call up the bill. 

The Social Democrats (SPD) and the Communists (KPD) were expected to vote against the Act. The government had already arrested all Communist and some Social Democrat deputies under the Reichstag Fire Decree. The Nazis expected the parties representing the middle class, the Junkers and business interests to vote for the measure, as they had grown weary of the instability of the Weimar Republic and would not dare to resist. 
Hitler believed that with the Centre Party members' votes, he would get the necessary two-thirds majority. Hitler negotiated with the Centre Party's chairman, Ludwig Kaas, a Catholic priest, finalising an agreement by 22 March. Kaas agreed to support the Act in exchange for assurances of the Centre Party's continued existence, the protection of Catholics' civil and religious liberties, religious schools and the retention of civil servants affiliated with the Centre Party. It has also been suggested that some members of the SPD were intimidated by the presence of the Nazi Sturmabteilung (SA) throughout the proceedings.[8] 

Some historians, such as Klaus Scholder, have maintained that Hitler also promised to negotiate a Reichskonkordat with the Holy See, a treaty that formalised the position of the Catholic Church in Germany on a national level. Kaas was a close associate of Cardinal Pacelli, then Vatican Secretary of State (and later Pope Pius XII). Pacelli had been pursuing a German concordat as a key policy for some years, but the instability of Weimar governments as well as the enmity of some parties to such a treaty had blocked the project.[9] The day after the Enabling Act vote, Kaas went to Rome in order to, in his own words, "investigate the possibilities for a comprehensive understanding between church and state".[10] However, so far no evidence for a link between the Enabling Act and the Reichskonkordat signed on 20 July 1933 has surfaced. 

Text

As with most of the laws passed in the process of Gleichschaltung, the Enabling Act is quite short, especially considering its implications. The full text, in German[11] and English, follows: 

Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich 
Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the Reich 
Der Reichstag hat das folgende Gesetz beschlossen, das mit Zustimmung des Reichsrats hiermit verkündet wird, nachdem festgestellt ist, daß die Erfordernisse verfassungsändernder Gesetzgebung erfüllt sind:

The Reichstag has enacted the following law, which is hereby proclaimed with the assent of the Reichsrat, it having been established that the requirements for a constitutional amendment have been fulfilled: 

Artikel 1 Article 1 
Reichsgesetze können außer in dem in der Reichsverfassung vorgesehenen Verfahren auch durch die Reichsregierung beschlossen werden. Dies gilt auch für die in den Artikeln 85 Abs. 2 und 87 der Reichsverfassung bezeichneten Gesetze.

In addition to the procedure prescribed by the constitution, laws of the Reich may also be enacted by the government[12] of the Reich. This includes the laws referred to by Articles 85 Paragraph 2 and Article 87 of the constitution.[13] 

Artikel 2 Article 2 

Die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Reichsgesetze können von der Reichsverfassung abweichen, soweit sie nicht die Einrichtung des Reichstags und des Reichsrats als solche zum Gegenstand haben. Die Rechte des Reichspräsidenten bleiben unberührt.

Laws enacted by the government of the Reich may deviate from the constitution as long as they do not affect the institutions of the Reichstag and the Reichsrat. The rights of the President remain unaffected. 

Artikel 3 Article 3 
Die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Reichsgesetze werden vom Reichskanzler ausgefertigt und im Reichsgesetzblatt verkündet. Sie treten, soweit sie nichts anderes bestimmen, mit dem auf die Verkündung folgenden Tage in Kraft. Die Artikel 68 bis 77 der Reichsverfassung finden auf die von der Reichsregierung beschlossenen Gesetze keine Anwendung.

Laws enacted by the Reich government shall be issued by the Chancellor and announced in the Reich Gazette. They shall take effect on the day following the announcement, unless they prescribe a different date. Articles 68 to 77 of the Constitution do not apply to laws enacted by the Reich government.[14] 

Artikel 4 Article 4 

Verträge des Reiches mit fremden Staaten, die sich auf Gegenstände der Reichsgesetzgebung beziehen, bedürfen für die Dauer der Geltung dieser Gesetze nicht der Zustimmung der an der Gesetzgebung beteiligten Körperschaften. Die Reichsregierung erläßt die zur Durchführung dieser Verträge erforderlichen Vorschriften. 

Treaties of the Reich with foreign states, which relate to matters of Reich legislation, shall for the duration of the validity of these laws not require the consent of the legislative authorities. The Reich government shall enact the legislation necessary to implement these agreements. 

Artikel 5 Article 5 

Dieses Gesetz tritt mit dem Tage seiner Verkündung in Kraft. Es tritt mit dem 1. April 1937 außer Kraft; es tritt ferner außer Kraft, wenn die gegenwärtige Reichsregierung durch eine andere abgelöst wird.

This law enters into force on the day of its proclamation. It expires on 1 April 1937; it expires furthermore if the present Reich government is replaced by another. 
Articles 1 and 4 gave the government the right to draw up the budget and approve treaties without input from the Reichstag. 

Act (page 1)

Act (page 2 with signatures)
Passage
Debate within the Centre Party continued until the day of the vote, 23 March 1933, with Kaas advocating voting in favour of the act, referring to an upcoming written guarantee from Hitler, while former Chancellor Heinrich Brüning called for a rejection of the Act. The majority sided with Kaas, and Brüning agreed to maintain party discipline by voting for the Act.[15] 

The Reichstag, led by its President, Hermann Göring, changed its rules of procedure to make it easier to pass the bill. Under the Weimar Constitution, a quorum of two-thirds of the entire Reichstag membership was required to be present in order to bring up a constitutional amendment bill. In this case, 432 of the Reichstag's 647 deputies would have normally been required for a quorum. However, Göring reduced the quorum to 378 by not counting the 81 KPD deputies. Despite the virulent rhetoric directed against the Communists, the Nazis did not formally ban the KPD right away. Not only did they fear a violent uprising, but they hoped the KPD's presence on the ballot would siphon off votes from the SPD. However, it was an open secret that the KPD deputies would never be allowed to take their seats; they were thrown in jail as quickly as the police could track them down. Courts began taking the line that since the Communists were responsible for the fire, KPD membership was an act of treason. Thus, for all intents and purposes, the KPD was banned as of 6 March, the day after the election.[16] 

Göring also declared that any deputy who was "absent without excuse" was to be considered as present, in order to overcome obstructions. Leaving nothing to chance, the Nazis used the provisions of the Reichstag Fire Decree to detain several SPD deputies. A few others saw the writing on the wall and fled into exile. 

Later that day, the Reichstag assembled under intimidating circumstances, with SA men swarming inside and outside the chamber.[15] Hitler's speech, which emphasised the importance of Christianity in German culture,[17] was aimed particularly at appeasing the Centre Party's sensibilities and incorporated Kaas' requested guarantees almost verbatim. Kaas gave a speech, voicing the Centre's support for the bill amid "concerns put aside", while Brüning notably remained silent. 

Only SPD chairman Otto Wels spoke against the Act, declaring that the proposed bill could not "destroy ideas which are eternal and indestructible." Kaas had still not received the written constitutional guarantees he had negotiated, but with the assurance it was being "typed up", voting began. Kaas never received the letter.[15][page needed] 

At this stage, the majority of deputies already supported the bill, and any deputies who might have been reluctant to vote in favour were intimidated by the SA troops surrounding the meeting. In the end, all parties except the SPD voted in favour of the Enabling Act. With the KPD banned and 26 SPD deputies arrested or in hiding, the final tally was 444 in favour of the Enabling Act against 94 (all Social Democrats) opposed. The Reichstag had adopted the Enabling Act with the support of 83% of the deputies. The session took place under such intimidating conditions that even if all SPD deputies had been present, it would have still passed with 78.7% support. The same day in the evening, the Reichsrat also gave its approval, unanimously and without prior discussion.[18] The Act was then signed into law by President Hindenburg. 

Consequences

Under the Act, the government had acquired the authority to pass laws without either parliamentary consent or control. These laws could (with certain exceptions) even deviate from the Constitution. The Act effectively eliminated the Reichstag as active players in German politics. While its existence was protected by the Enabling Act, for all intents and purposes it reduced the Reichstag to a mere stage for Hitler's speeches. It only met sporadically until the end of World War II, held no debates and enacted only a few laws. Within three months of the passage of the Enabling Act, all parties except the Nazi Party were banned or pressured into dissolving themselves, followed on 14 July by a law that made the Nazi Party the only legally permitted party in the country. With this, Hitler had fulfilled what he had promised in earlier campaign speeches: "I set for myself one aim ... to sweep these thirty parties out of Germany!"[19] 

During the negotiations between the government and the political parties, it was agreed that the government should inform the Reichstag parties of legislative measures passed under the Enabling Act. For this purpose, a working committee was set up, co-chaired by Hitler and Centre Party chairman Kaas. However, this committee met only three times without any major impact, and rapidly became a dead letter even before all other parties were banned. 

Though the Act had formally given legislative powers to the government as a whole, these powers were for all intents and purposes exercised by Hitler himself. After its passage, there were no longer serious deliberations in Cabinet meetings. Its meetings became more and more infrequent after 1934, and it never met in full after 1938. 

Due to the great care that Hitler took to give his dictatorship an appearance of legality, the Enabling Act was renewed twice, in 1937 and 1941. However, its renewal was practically assured since all other parties were banned. Voters were presented with a single list of Nazis and Nazi-approved "guest" candidates under far-from-secret conditions. In 1942, the Reichstag passed a law giving Hitler power of life and death over every citizen, effectively extending the provisions of the Enabling Act for the duration of the war.[20] 

Ironically, two, and possibly three, of the penultimate measures Hitler took to consolidate his power in 1934 violated the Enabling Act. In February 1934, the Reichsrat, representing the states, was abolished even though Article 2 of the Enabling Act specifically protected the existence of both the Reichstag and the Reichsrat. It can be argued that the Enabling Act had been breached two weeks earlier by the Law for the Reconstruction of the Reich, which transferred the states' powers to the Reich and effectively left the Reichsrat impotent. Article 2 stated that laws passed under the Enabling Act could not affect the institutions of either chamber. In August, Hindenburg died, and Hitler seized the president's powers for himself in accordance with a law passed the previous day. Article 2 stated that the president's powers were to remain "undisturbed," which has long been interpreted to mean that it forbade Hitler from tampering with the presidency. A 1932 amendment to the constitution made the president of the High Court of Justice, not the chancellor, first in the line of succession to the presidency—and even then on an interim basis pending new elections.[15] However, the Enabling Act provided no remedy for any violations of Article 2, and these actions were never challenged in court. 

In his book, The Coming of the Third Reich British historian Richard J. Evans argued that the Enabling Act was legally invalid. He contended that Göring had no right to arbitrarily reduce the quorum required to bring the bill up for a vote. While the Enabling Act only required the support of two-thirds of those present and voting, two-thirds of the entire Reichstag's membership had to be present in order for the legislature to consider a constitutional amendment. Evans argued that Göring was not required to count the KPD deputies in order to get the Enabling Act passed, he was required to "recognize their existence" by counting them for purposes of the quorum needed to call it up, making Göring's refusal to do so "an illegal act." (Even if the Communists had been present and voting, the atmosphere of the sitting was such that the Act would have still passed with, at the very least, 68.7 percent support.) He also argued that the act's passage in the Reichsrat was tainted by the overthrow of the state governments.[16] 

Portrayal in films
The 2003 film Hitler: The Rise of Evil contains a scene portraying the passage of the Enabling Act. The portrayal in the film is inaccurate, with the provisions of the Reichstag Fire Decree (which in practice, as the name states, was a decree issued by President Hindenburg weeks before the Enabling Act) merged into the Act. Non-Nazi members of the Reichstag, including Vice-Chancellor von Papen, are shown objecting. In reality the Act met little resistance, with only the centre-left Social Democratic Party voting against passage. 

The same film also shows Hermann Göring, the then speaker of the house, begin singing "Deutschlandlied". Nazi representatives then stand and immediately join in with Göring, all other party members join in too, with everyone performing the Hitler salute. In reality, this never happened. 

References
1.
•  Rabinbach, Anson; Gilman, Sander L. (2013). The Third Reich Sourcebook. p. 52. ISBN 0520276833. 
•  •  "The Reichstag Fire and the Enabling Act of March 23, 1933 | Britannica Blog". blogs.britannica.com. Retrieved 30 March 2017. 
•  •  (www.dw.com), Deutsche Welle. "The law that 'enabled' Hitler's dictatorship | Germany | DW.COM 23 March 2013". DW.COM. Retrieved 30 March 2017. 
•  •  Mason, K.J. Republic to Reich: A History of Germany 1918–1945. McGraw-Hill. 
•  •  Kitson, Alison. Germany, 1858–1990: Hope, Terror, and Revival, pages 153–154 (Oxford U. Press 2001). 
•  •  Daniela Kahn (2006). Die Steurung der Wirtschaft durch Recht im nationalsozialistischen Deutschland. Das Beispiel der Reichsgruppe Industrie. ISBN 978-3-465-04012-5. 
•  •  Rüdiger Jungbluth (2002). Die Quandts. Ihr leiser Aufstieg zur mächtigsten Wirtschaftsdynastie Deutschlands. ISBN 3-593-36940-0. 
•  •  Martin Collier, From Kaiser to Fuhrer: Germany, 1900–45, p131 
•  •  Klaus Scholder "The Churches and the Third Reich" volume 1 pp 160–1 
•  •  Letter from Kaas to von Bergen, German ambassador to the Vatican, translation quoted in Scholder, p. 247 
•  •  Uwe Brodersen, Gesetze des NS-Staates, p. 22 
•  •  The word government, as used here, means just the chancellor and the cabinet, comparable to the usage of the word in the United Kingdom, and not the entire national government as it is used in the United States. 
•  •  Article 85 outlined the process by which the Reichstag and Reichsrat approved the Reich budget. Article 87 restricted government borrowing. 
•  •  Articles 68 to 77 stipulated the procedures for enacting legislation in the Reichstag. 
•  •  William Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Touchstone Edition, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990 
•  •  Evans, Richard J. (2003). The Coming of the Third Reich. New York City: Penguin Press. ISBN 978-0141009759. 
•  •  "Adolf Hitler: Compromises with Atheism Destroy Religious, Ethical Values". about.com. Retrieved 2 December 2016. 
•  •  Wheaton, Eliot Barculo (1968). The Nazi Revolution 1933–35. p. 269. 
•  •  Nationalbibliothek, Österreichische. "ÖNB-ALEX – Deutsches Reichsgesetzblatt Teil I 1867–1945". alex.onb.ac.at. Retrieved 14 October 2016. 
20. •  "HITLER SEIZES LIFE AND DEATH RULE OF NAZIS (April 27, 1942)". Retrieved 14 October 2016. 

Saturday, January 25, 2020

UPDATE - TYRANNY STARTS NOW!



This is a fanciful, fictional projection of life in the United States in the event trump wins the election in 2020.

Since non-voters are perhaps the largest voting bloc in Presidential Elections, it has been argued that non-voters gave the elections to Trump. That bloc may hand the election to him again if they remain on the sidelines.

Since he has associated with and praised tyrants, it is reasonable to think that he is predisposed toward tyranny.

Several predictions have been made that he will be very hard to remove from office, even if he loses the election.

Here's what the decade might look like if he wins in 2020 and then stays [Please note that the examples listed below have been observed in other countries]:

UPDATE - TYRANNY STARTS NOW!

Tyrants playbook 101 - Attack your political enemies with the power of the state:
  • 'President Trump just issued landmark anti-counterfeiting regulations.
  • The new customs framework addresses the problem of counterfeit goods. It will put Amazon on the hook for policing counterfeit goods.
  • The Trump administration’s move fundamentally threatens Amazon’s operating cost structure and its long-term growth strategy.
Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) has an existential challenge ahead. The Trump administration unveiled new rules to combat counterfeit and pirated goods Friday. The new policies, which were published by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), will do what the courts have largely opted not to do: hold Amazon responsible for counterfeit goods.'

[https://www.ccn.com/president-trump-just-delivered-a-death-blow-to-amazon/?fbclid=IwAR3Af4jzW0qAy5ZHte5znRn-Evm6vZz-44x_qcEFowey4YhHWzq6ZeTOGFA]

NOW - BACK TO THE FUTURE

JEFF BEZOS JAILED - Former head of Amazon and owner of the Liberal Newspaper Washington Post Jeff Bezos has been jailed in Belize on behalf of the United States.

Bezos was on the run from Federal prosecution from several lawsuits and criminal charges stemming from complaints filed against him in Washington. The veracity of the charges has been challenged by Bezos, but his Amazon empire has been broken up and sold to various corporate entities as part of consent decrees from federal courts. The famous newspaper has been sold to FOX news and, while still publishing, has moderated its criticisms of President for Life Trump. Trump has generously allowed Bezos to remain in Belize so long as he refrains from political activity.

Jared Kushner has taken over ownership of Bezos' flagship Amazon.com

JUDICIAL MURDERS TOP 1000 FOR THE FIRST TIME - The National American front has continued its campaign of eliminating 'liberal' judges and court officials that began in 2025. The campaign claimed 1000 lives per year for the first time this year.

MISSING JOURNALIST RACHEL MADDOW RUMORED ASSASSINATED IN U.S. EMBASSY IN ISTANBUL - Maddow, the infamous liberal television commentator, was pursuing a story about Turkey when she was called into the US embassy last week. She has not been seen since and rumors are that she has been tortured, killed and dismembered. No further details are available. President For Life Trump called these reports 'Fake News'.

MSNBC SOLD TO SEAN HANNITY President For Life Trump has congratulated Hannity on his acquisition of the reviled liberal news channel MSNBC. Hannity promises to modify the editorial stance of the network and has already fired all its on-air talent. They will be replaced with personalities suggested by the President For Life.

UNITEDHEALTHCARE MAKES RECORD PROFITS - [This is a real press release this week]

UnitedHealth beat forecasts on earnings for the fourth quarter of 2019, though revenues of $60.9 billion were slightly lower than Wall Street's expectations. The Minnetonka, Minnesota-based healthcare giant's stock traded up roughly 3% in late morning trading Wednesday.

Health services segment Optum drove $29.8 billion in revenue in the quarter, up more than 8% year over year; and UnitedHealthcare, the nation's largest private payer, reported revenue of $48.3 billion, up 4.4%. The payer reported a medical loss ratio of 82.5% for the full year, up from 81.6% in 2018 as the impact of the health insurance tax deferral was partially offset by improved medical cost management.

UnitedHealth executives cheered the repeal of the health insurance tax on a Wednesday call with investors.

DeVOS SECURITY CORP GRANTED CONTRACT TO REMOVE HOMELESS FROM AMERICAN CITIES. Former Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos now is CEO of DeVos Security. She has stated that the contracted $500 per person per day is just barely adequate to remove the homeless from city streets, house them and make the streets secure. She promises to do her best for the homeless as well as keeping America's cities more pleasant. She denies strenuously that private companies are harvesting body parts from the homeless detainees for sale on the Asian body part markets. The black APC's used to detain homeless people can be seen in major city homeless encampments between midnight and 3 am. President For Life Trump praised the more pleasant streets in several cities. 'We don't want to see human misery on our way to work," he said.

POLICE IN SEVERAL CITIES USE RUBBER BULLETS TO CONTROL UNRULY PROTESTS. Anti Administration protests on public streets in New York and Los Angeles spiraled out of control yesterday. Our valiant police used non-lethal tactics to control the demonstrations including water cannons and rubber bullets. Police deny reports that live ammunition was used and blame the violent counter protesters from the National American Front for any deaths.

FOX CORP RECEIVES AWARD AS THE MOST 'RESPONSIBLE' LIBERAL NEWS OUTLET IN AMERICA. FOX Corp CEO Donald Trump Jr. expresses appreciation for the award at a banquet at The Mar-a-Lago Club resort in Florida.

DEFICIT FORCES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO REDUCE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS. Due to the continuing recession Social Security payments have increased while tax collections have declined. In order to balance the budget President For Life Trump proposes further corporate tax cuts to stimulate business investment while at the same time reducing payments to individuals from the bankrupt Social Security Trust Fund.


Thursday, January 23, 2020

Trolls Tried To Divide USA


Trolls in IRA had goal to destabilize the USA

A person who worked for the Russian "troll farm" Internet Research Agency discussed the organization with the independent Russian news outlet Dozhd.

The secretive factory had several components, including a "Russian desk," a "foreign desk," a "Facebook desk," and a "Department of Provocations," according to the former troll, who went by the name "Maxim."

The Russian desk operated bots and trolls that used fake social-media accounts to flood the internet with pro-Trump messages and made-up news.

The foreign desk was more sophisticated, with trolls required to learn the nuances of American politics to best "rock the boat" on divisive issues.

"Our task was to set Americans against their own government," Maxim said, "to provoke unrest and discontent."

Article here: https://www.businessinsider.com/former-troll-russia-disinformation-campaign-trump-2017-10?fbclid=IwAR3ovqFsp2anX8abiMdpHNnv3ZCePtLNbYeUZbaQ6EMXJh2FUajW4bqFkZY 

Saturday, January 4, 2020

Personal, Profane Rant about Republicans

This is my personal rant.

It is about Republicans.

It is profane.

I fucking dare you to read it.

Republicans, all of you: You are gutless fucking cowards and traitors.

How dare you stand up in the United States and call yourselves Americans.

How dare you.

You - Nunes, Rubio, McConnell, Paul, McCarthy, Graham, Mnuchin, Bossie, Robert and Rebekah Mercer and the rest of you bastards.

You take Russian money to betray the United States for your personal gain.

You support a traitor in the White House.

He gets Putin's permission before killing an Iranian general. That helps Russia and it will murder American soldiers and perhaps some diplomats.

And all this is to protect your job.

Jesus Fucking Christ.

Washington, Adams, Madison, Hamilton, Franklin and even Benedict Arnold - all the Founding Fathers are disgusted at you. You have sullied the name and honor of the United States.

And you have done so in the name and service to a traitor in the White House.

He is a traitorous pedophile racist misogynistic corrupt thug.

Your career is over regardless of what happens next. You are hated and reviled for your cowardice and greed.

If you continue this path, you will ensure the installation of a thugocracy in the United States and you will be forever known as just that: a traitor and a coward.

You will live to see the results of your actions and you will be ashamed. Your children and grandchildren will be ashamed of your name forever.

I am ashamed of you.

Mike P. McKeever

Thursday, January 2, 2020

Dialog for Hope



Americans of all beliefs want to come together as a country and find our commonalities. But, we are engaged in a divisive non-discussion of our differences. Seemingly, we just shout at each other - sound and fury signifying nothing.

Part of the difficulty may be that many Conservatives recognize only emotions as legitimate discussion points while Liberals recognize only facts as legitimate.

It is time for Liberals to join a discussion about emotions.

One of the dominant themes in Conservative emotions seems to be fear of change. From that fear may spring hatred of any ideas and people which appear to support change.

The antidote to that fear may well be hope.

Maybe if Liberals talk about the things we hope for instead of the things we are against, we can find a common ground with some Conservatives. We are all Americans and perhaps focusing on the goals we all want can help bring us together.

We are weak when we are divided and strong when we are together.

A great thing about that is there are lots and lots of things we can all hope for.

Here is a preliminary list - please add your own.

THE AMERICAN DREAM

The American Dream is not dead but it is asleep. We want to revive that dream where our children can have better lives. We hope that the barriers to that dream can be removed or reduced.

ALL AMERICANS DESERVE A CHANCE TO ACHIEVE THE AMERICAN DREAM

Our dream is about the opportunity to secure a better life through hard work. But, severe inequalities of incomes and wealth between Americans make it difficult for all Americans to achieve that dream.

Those who work actively to enrich themselves at the expense of others are Un-American. It is an American value to prevent that from occurring and then punish those who try to do so.

Americans who cannot try, or who try and fail to achieve that dream should not be abandoned by our country. We are all in it together and we have the responsibility to care for those who do not succeed.

THERE IS ONLY ONE SET OF FACTS

We will come together more quickly when the truth is told. The truth always comes out. And, a Free Press is the best guarantor that the truth will come out. The Mainstream Media is being attacked today because some politicians don't like the truth.

While there is a single set of facts, it is difficult to find them since perceptions of truth can vary from observer to observer. Our best hope to finding truth is the Mainstream Media which discovers and then verifies facts.

Alternative facts are lies; there is only one real set of facts.

Abraham Lincoln said it: 'You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.'

AMERICA IS A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS

America WELCOMES immigrants. We do not fear immigrants. We are a nation of immigrants. As long as those who seek to come here are vetted to prevent those who would do us harm from entering, we welcome all who wish to be Americans.

Erecting false and illegal barriers to immigration is simply cruel and fundamentally Un-American.

AMERICA IS A SECULAR COUNTRY WHICH RESPECTS ALL FAITHS.

Person of all faiths are free to practice their personal faith without persecution. There is no officially recognized state religion. Established police authorities will secure that right for all.



Monday, December 30, 2019

Fall 2019 Country Studies Published


The Mike P. McKeever institute of Economic Policy Analysis [MIEPA] is pleased to announce the publication of its Fall 2019 Economic Policy Analyses.

Two countries - Belarus and Bulgaria - are examined for the first time, while several other countries which have been analyzed previously have received updated studies.

Belarus is analyzed by Specialist K. S. and is available here: http://www.mkeever.com/belarus.html

Brazil is analyzed by Specialist Klaisyon Borges De Paulo and is available here: http://www.mkeever.com/brazil.html

Bulgaria is analyzed by Specialist Dimitri Zlatev and is available here:  http://www.mkeever.com/bulgaria.html

China is analyzed by Specialist Lucien E. Rideau and is available here: http://www.mkeever.com/china.html

France is analyzed by Specialists Shannon Fracchia and David Rouxel and is available here: http://www.mkeever.com/france.html

Japan is analyzed by Specialist Itsuki Daito and is available here: http://www.mkeever.com/japan.html

The United States is analyzed by Specialists Lilah Segal-Angel, Victor Chen, Ciana Knight, Alexander Kung, Maddie Papenfuss, Brandon Peace and Nhi Tran and is available here: http://www.mkeever.com/usa.html

Lastly, VietNam is analyzed by Specialist Lua Chin and is available here: http://www.mkeever.com/vietnam.html

The Specialists and MIEPA are sensitive to the potential dangers they may face as a result of publishing their opinions in this space.

MIEPA home page is: www.mkeever.com

Thursday, December 26, 2019

Bribe McConnell !! Graham !! Paul !!




OPEN LETTER TO TOM STEYER AND MICHAEL BLOOMBERG

Gentlemen:

While your dedication to help our country is admirable, it appears unlikely that you will win the Presidential nomination from the Democrat party in 2020.

But regardless of how that ends, there is something you can do today that will help our country immeasurably.

BRIBE THE GOP SENATORS WHO HAVE TAKEN RUSSIAN MONEY TO HARM THE UNITED STATES.

HAVE EACH VOTE TO CALL FOR TESTIMONY FROM WITNESSES IN THE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL AND ALSO SUPPORT BI-PARTISAN LEGISLATION.

Here are the Congress people for sale:

Mitch McConnell - Price $3.5 million

Lindsay Graham - Price $800K

Rand Paul - $ 1.5 million

Marco Rubio - $1.5 million.

Kevin McCarthy - price TBD

[I am not able to source the data, but it appears likely to be true. Here is a link to a list of Russian players: https://themoscowproject.org/players/ ]

Switching their votes will help our country immediately.

While our democracy is based on the idea that honorable officials will do the best thing for the country, the above officials have demonstrated clearly that they will sell out the country for the right price.

trump is probably beyond mere money at this point - Putin seemingly has some unknown hold over him, perhaps Putin has threatened the lives of his family. Time may tell

“Ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country,” JFK.


Friday, December 20, 2019

UPDATE - Cybercom has plans to attack Russia

UPDATE - Cybercom has plans to attack Russia

https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-cybercom-looks-to-target-russian-elite-if-moscow-messes-with-2020-election?fbclid=IwAR05F1c8I_5E-XvgBY5yh7KGxEPGg5DCjVNs4noWZBMCyGnqaCFxrvK9rzc

Now is the time to go off books and take out the bad guys: the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg, TheSoul Publishing in Cyprus and all the rest.

They are targeting Democracy everywhere and will cause real and permanent damage to Western Civilization. At Putin's behest they are waging an all out war on the West. It is a fight for survival. It is not a drill.

It has to be off books because our governments are compromised. There will be zero official acknowledgment or support.

You will be on your own, but we really need you.

We beg you: Go into the dark to bring light back to us.

Trump Should Be Removed from Office, CHRISTIANITY TODAY

Mark Galli is editor in chief of Christianity Today.

'In our founding documents, Billy Graham explains that Christianity Today will help evangelical Christians interpret the news in a manner that reflects their faith. The impeachment of Donald Trump is a significant event in the story of our republic. It requires comment.

The typical CT approach is to stay above the fray and allow Christians with different political convictions to make their arguments in the public square, to encourage all to pursue justice according to their convictions and treat their political opposition as charitably as possible. We want CT to be a place that welcomes Christians from across the political spectrum, and reminds everyone that politics is not the end and purpose of our being. We take pride in the fact, for instance, that politics does not dominate our homepage.

That said, we do feel it necessary from time to time to make our own opinions on political matters clear—always, as Graham encouraged us, doing so with both conviction and love. We love and pray for our president, as we love and pray for leaders (as well as ordinary citizens) on both sides of the political aisle.

Let’s grant this to the president: The Democrats have had it out for him from day one, and therefore nearly everything they do is under a cloud of partisan suspicion. This has led many to suspect not only motives but facts in these recent impeachment hearings. And, no, Mr. Trump did not have a serious opportunity to offer his side of the story in the House hearings on impeachment.

But the facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president’s political opponents. That is not only a violation of the Constitution; more importantly, it is profoundly immoral.

The reason many are not shocked about this is that this president has dumbed down the idea of morality in his administration. He has hired and fired a number of people who are now convicted criminals. He himself has admitted to immoral actions in business and his relationship with women, about which he remains proud. His Twitter feed alone—with its habitual string of mischaracterizations, lies, and slanders—is a near perfect example of a human being who is morally lost and confused.

Trump’s evangelical supporters have pointed to his Supreme Court nominees, his defense of religious liberty, and his stewardship of the economy, among other things, as achievements that justify their support of the president. We believe the impeachment hearings have made it absolutely clear, in a way the Mueller investigation did not, that President Trump has abused his authority for personal gain and betrayed his constitutional oath. The impeachment hearings have illuminated the president’s moral deficiencies for all to see. This damages the institution of the presidency, damages the reputation of our country, and damages both the spirit and the future of our people. None of the president’s positives can balance the moral and political danger we face under a leader of such grossly immoral character.

This concern for the character of our national leader is not new in CT. In 1998, we wrote this:
The President's failure to tell the truth—even when cornered—rips at the fabric of the nation. This is not a private affair. For above all, social intercourse is built on a presumption of trust: trust that the milk your grocer sells you is wholesome and pure; trust that the money you put in your bank can be taken out of the bank; trust that your babysitter, firefighters, clergy, and ambulance drivers will all do their best. And while politicians are notorious for breaking campaign promises, while in office they have a fundamental obligation to uphold our trust in them and to live by the law.
And this:
Unsavory dealings and immoral acts by the President and those close to him have rendered this administration morally unable to lead.
Unfortunately, the words that we applied to Mr. Clinton 20 years ago apply almost perfectly to our current president. Whether Mr. Trump should be removed from office by the Senate or by popular vote next election—that is a matter of prudential judgment. That he should be removed, we believe, is not a matter of partisan loyalties but loyalty to the Creator of the Ten Commandments.

To the many evangelicals who continue to support Mr. Trump in spite of his blackened moral record, we might say this: Remember who you are and whom you serve. Consider how your justification of Mr. Trump influences your witness to your Lord and Savior. Consider what an unbelieving world will say if you continue to brush off Mr. Trump’s immoral words and behavior in the cause of political expediency. If we don’t reverse course now, will anyone take anything we say about justice and righteousness with any seriousness for decades to come? Can we say with a straight face that abortion is a great evil that cannot be tolerated and, with the same straight face, say that the bent and broken character of our nation’s leader doesn’t really matter in the end?

We have reserved judgment on Mr. Trump for years now. Some have criticized us for our reserve. But when it comes to condemning the behavior of another, patient charity must come first. So we have done our best to give evangelical Trump supporters their due, to try to understand their point of view, to see the prudential nature of so many political decisions they have made regarding Mr. Trump. To use an old cliché, it’s time to call a spade a spade, to say that no matter how many hands we win in this political poker game, we are playing with a stacked deck of gross immorality and ethical incompetence. And just when we think it’s time to push all our chips to the center of the table, that’s when the whole game will come crashing down. It will crash down on the reputation of evangelical religion and on the world’s understanding of the gospel. And it will come crashing down on a nation of men and women whose welfare is also our concern.'


Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Judiciary Committee REPORT With Dissenting Views


Introduction below -

 read full report here: [https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20191216/CRPT-116hrpt346.pdf]

Mr. NADLER, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted  the  following R  E  P  O  R  T  together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany H. Res. 755]

The  Committee  on  the  Judiciary,  to  whom  was  referred  the  reso-lution  (H.  Res.  755)  impeaching  Donald  John  Trump,  President  of  the  United  States,  for  high  crimes  and  misdemeanors,  having  con-sidered  the  same,  reports  favorably  thereon  pursuant  to  H.  Res.  660  with  an  amendment  and  recommends  that  the  resolution  as  amended be agreed to. The amendment is as follows: Strike  all  that  follows  after  the  resolving  clause  and  insert  the  following:That  Donald  John  Trump,  President  of  the  United  States,  is  impeached  for  high  crimes  and  misdemeanors  and  that  the  following  articles  of  impeachment  be  exhib-ited to the United States Senate:

Articles  of  impeachment  exhibited  by  the  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States  of  America  in  the  name  of  itself  and  of  the  people  of  the  United  States  of  America,  against  Donald  John  Trump,  President  of  the  United  States  of  America,  in  maintenance  and  support  of  its  impeachment  against  him  for  high  crimes  and  misdemeanors.

ARTICLE I: ABUSE OF POWER

The  Constitution  provides  that  the  House  of  Representatives  ‘‘shall  have  the  sole  Power of Impeachment’’ and that the President ‘‘shall be removed from Office on Im-peachment  for,  and  Conviction  of,  Treason,  Bribery,  or  other  high  Crimes  and  Mis-demeanors’’.

In  his  conduct  of  the  office  of  President  of  the  United  States—and  in  violation  of  his  constitutional  oath  faithfully  to  execute  the  office  of  President  of  the  United  States  and,  to  the  best  of  his  ability,  preserve,  protect,  and  defend  the  Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that  the  laws  be  faithfully  executed

—Donald  J.  Trump  has  abused  the  powers  of  the Presidency, in that:

Using  the  powers  of  his  high  office,  President  Trump  solicited  the  interference  of  a  foreign  government,  Ukraine,  in  the  2020  United  States  Presidential  election.  He  did  so  through  a  scheme  or  course  of  conduct  that  included  soliciting  the  Govern-ment  of  Ukraine  to  publicly  announce  investigations  that  would  benefit  his  reelec-tion,  harm  the  election  prospects  of  a  political  opponent,  and  influence  the  2020  United  States  Presidential  election  to  his  advantage.

 President  Trump  also  sought  to  pressure  the  Government  of  Ukraine  to  take  these  steps  by  conditioning  official  United  States  Government  acts  of  significant  value  to  Ukraine  on  its  public  an-nouncement  of  the  investigations.  President  Trump  engaged  in  this  scheme  or  course  of  conduct  for  corrupt  purposes  in  pursuit  of  personal  political  benefit.  In  so  doing,  President  Trump  used  the  powers  of  the  Presidency  in  a  manner  that  com-promised  the  national  security  of  the  United  States  and  undermined  the  integrity  of  the  United  States  democratic  process.  He  thus  ignored  and  injured  the  interests  of the Nation.

President  Trump  engaged  in  this  scheme  or  course  of  conduct  through  the  fol-lowing means: (1)  President  Trump—acting  both  directly  and  through  his  agents  within  and  outside  the  United  States  Government—corruptly  solicited  the  Government  of  Ukraine to publicly announce investigations into—

(A)  a  political  opponent,  former  Vice  President  Joseph  R.  Biden,  Jr.;  and

(B)  a  discredited  theory  promoted  by  Russia  alleging  that  Ukraine—rather  than  Russia—interfered  in  the  2016  United  States  Presidential  election.

With  the  same  corrupt  motives,  President  Trump—acting  both  directly  and through his agents within and outside
the United States Government—conditioned  two  official  acts  on  the  public  announcements  that  he  had  requested—

(A)  the  release  of  $391  million  of  United  States  taxpayer  funds  that  Con-gress  had  appropriated  on  a  bipartisan  basis  for  the  purpose  of  providing  vital  military  and  security  assistance  to  Ukraine  to  oppose  Russian  aggression and which President Trump had ordered suspended; and

(B)  a  head  of  state  meeting  at  the  White  House,  which  the  President  of  Ukraine  sought  to  demonstrate  continued  United  States  support  for  the  Government of Ukraine in the face of Russian aggression.

Faced  with  the  public  revelation  of  his  actions,  President  Trump  ultimately  released  the  military  and  security  assistance  to  the  Government  of  Ukraine,   but   has   persisted   in   openly   and   corruptly   urging and soliciting   Ukraine to undertake investigations for his personal political benefit. These  actions  were  consistent  with  President  Trump’s  previous  invitations  of  foreign interference in United States elections. In  all  of  this,  President  Trump  abused  the  powers  of  the  Presidency  by  ignoring  and  injuring  national  security  and  other  vital  national  interests  to  obtain  an  im-proper  personal  political  benefit.  He  has  also  betrayed  the  Nation  by  abusing  his  high office to enlist a foreign power in corrupting democratic elections. Wherefore  President  Trump,  by  such  conduct,  has  demonstrated  that  he  will  re-main  a  threat  to  national  security  and  the  Constitution  if  allowed  to  remain  in  office,  and  has  acted  in  a  manner  grossly  incompatible  with  self-governance  and  the  rule  of  law.  President  Trump  thus  warrants  impeachment  and  trial,  removal  from  office,  and  disqualification  to  hold  and  enjoy  any  office  of  honor,  trust,  or  profit  under the United States.

ARTICLE II: OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS

The  Constitution  provides  that  the  House  of  Representatives  ‘‘shall  have  the  sole  Power of Impeachment’’ and that the President ‘‘shall be removed from Office on Impeachment  for,  and  Conviction  of,  Treason,  Bribery,  or  other  high  Crimes  and  Misdemeanors’’.  In  his  conduct  of  the  office  of  President  of  the  United  States—and  in  violation  of  his  constitutional  oath  faithfully  to  execute  the  office  of  President  of  the  United  States  and,  to  the  best  of  his  ability,  preserve,  protect,  and  defend  the  Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that  the  laws  be  faithfully  executed—Donald  J.  Trump  has  directed  the  unprecedented,  categorical,  and  indiscriminate  defiance  of  subpoenas  issued  by  the  House  of  Representatives  pursuant  to  its  ‘‘sole  Power  of  Impeachment’’.

 President  Trump  has  abused  the  powers  of  the  Presidency  in  a  manner  offensive  to,  and  subversive  of, the Constitution, in that: The  House  of  Representatives  has  engaged  in  an  impeachment  inquiry  focused  on  President  Trump’s  corrupt  solicitation  of  the  Government  of  Ukraine  to  interfere  in  the  2020  United  States  Presidential  election.  As  part  of  this  impeachment  inquiry,  the  Committees  undertaking  the  investigation  served  subpoenas  seeking  documents  and  testimony  deemed  vital  to  the  inquiry  from  various  Executive  Branch  agencies  and offices, and current and former officials. In  response,  without  lawful  cause  or  excuse,  President  Trump  directed  Executive  Branch agencies, offices, and officials not to comply with those subpoenas. President Trump  thus  interposed  the  powers  of  the  Presidency  against  the  lawful  subpoenas  of  the  House  of  Representatives,  and  assumed  to  himself  functions  and  judgments  necessary  to  the  exercise  of  the  ‘‘sole  Power  of  Impeachment’’  vested  by  the  Con-stitution in the House of Representatives.

President  Trump  abused  the  powers  of  his  high  office  through  the  following  means:

(1)  Directing  the  White  House  to  defy  a  lawful  subpoena  by  withholding  the  production of documents sought therein by the Committees.

(2)  Directing  other  Executive  Branch  agencies  and  offices  to  defy  lawful  subpoenas and withhold the production of documents and records from the Committees—in  response  to  which  the  Department  of  State,  Office  of  Management  and  Budget,  Department  of  Energy,  and  Department  of  Defense  refused  to  produce  a single document or record.

(3)  Directing  current  and  former  Executive  Branch  officials  not  to  cooperate  with  the  Committees—in  response  to  which  nine  Administration  officials  defied  subpoenas  for  testimony,  namely  John  Michael  ‘‘Mick’’  Mulvaney,  Robert  B.  Blair,  John  A.  Eisenberg,  Michael  Ellis,  Preston  Wells  Griffith,  Russell  T.  Vought, Michael Duffey, Brian McCormack, and T. Ulrich Brechbuhl.

 These  actions  were  consistent  with  President  Trump’s  previous  efforts  to  under-mine  United  States  Government  investigations  into  States elections.

Through  these  actions,  President  Trump  sought  to  arrogate  to  himself  the  right  to  determine  the  propriety,  scope,  and  nature  of  an  impeachment  inquiry  into  his  own  conduct,  as  well  as  the  unilateral  prerogative  to  deny  any  and  all  information  to  the  House  of  Representatives  in  the  exercise  of  its  ‘‘sole  Power  of  Impeachment’’.  In  the  history  of  the  Republic,  no  President  has  ever  ordered  the  complete  defiance  of an impeachment inquiry or sought to obstruct and impede so comprehensively the ability  of  the  House  of  Representatives  to  investigate  ‘‘high  Crimes  and  Misdemeanors’’.  This  abuse  of  office  served  to  cover  up  the  President’s  own  repeated  misconduct  and  to  seize  and  control  the  power  of  impeachment—and  thus  to  nullify  a vital constitutional safeguard vested solely in the House of Representatives.


 In  all  of  this,  President  Trump  has  acted  in  a  manner  contrary  to  his  trust  as  President  and  subversive  of  constitutional  government,  to  the  great  prejudice  of  the  cause  of  law  and  justice,  and  to  the  manifest  injury  of  the  people  of  the  United  States.

Wherefore,  President  Trump,  by  such  conduct,  has  demonstrated  that  he  will  re-main  a  threat  to  the  Constitution  if  allowed  to  remain  in  office,  and  has  acted  in  a  manner  grossly  incompatible  with  self-governance  and  the  rule  of  law.  President  Trump  thus  warrants  impeachment  and  trial,  removal  from  office,  and  disqualification  to  hold  and  enjoy  any  office  of  honor,  trust,  or  profit  under  the  United  States.