Thursday, February 9, 2017
Some of your comments upon taking office offer the impression that you believe you have a mandate to install your policies and that the overwhelming majority of voters approve those policies.
This is not correct.
Since several groups voted against you overwhelmingly, you are advised to govern with humility.
Failure to account for the interests of those who do not support you and your policies will result in serious unrest in the United States.
Listed below are the shares of several demographic voter groups who voted AGAINST you and your policies.
If a group is not listed, you received a small majority of votes in that group. For example, while 58% of Women voted against you, 52% of Men voted for you.
[Combining Clinton and Other Candidates shares as taken from CNN exit poll survey http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls]
DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS WHO VOTED AGAINST TRUMP IN 2016 ELECTION -
WOMEN - 58%
18 TO 29 YEAR OLD - 64%
30 TO 44 YEAR OLD - 59%
BLACK - 92%
LATINO - 74%
ASIAN - 73%
OTHER NON-WHITE - 64%
COLLEGE GRADUATES - 58%
INCOME UNDER $50K - 61%
INCOME $50K OR MORE - 52%
LIBERAL - 90%
MODERATE - 60%
HAS GOOD JUDGMENT - 75%
HAS RIGHT EXPERIENCE - 93%
Sunday, February 5, 2017
People are dying because trump is incompetent.
DEATH IN YEMEN
US President trump authorized a Yemeni raid Sunday, February 1, 2017 which former President Obama had refused to authorize. In that raid, several were killed.
Navy SEAL Team Chief Special Warfare Operator William "Ryan" Owens, 36, was killed and three other US troops were wounded in a fierce gunfight.
Additionally: 'A Yemeni provincial official had previously said 16 civilians were killed -- eight women and eight children -- but the Pentagon did not provide numbers.'
DEATH IN UKRAINE
Putin acting with free hand in Ukraine attacks killing an unknown number of people.
Excerpts from Foreign Policy.com article 'Putin Testing Trump Early With Ukraine Attacks', By Paul McLeary, February 1, 2017 - 3:25 pm
'....The international body tasked with monitoring violations of the Minsk agreement reported at least 2,300 explosions from artillery, mortars and rocket fire on Sunday alone, the day after the Trump-Putin call. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe said this was a sharp increase from the intermittent shelling that marks an ordinary day long the front, but that the fighting was so intense it could not properly keep count. .....
The Ukraine-Russia conflict was hard enough for Europe and the United States to confront when Europe was more unified, and transatlantic ties were strong.
Appearing before a House Armed Services panel Wednesday, former CIA Director David Petraeus testified that Putin understands very well “that while conventional aggression may occasionally enable Russia to grab a bit of land on its periphery, the real center of gravity is the political will of the major democratic powers to defend Euro-Atlantic institutions like NATO and the EU.”
But resurgent nationalism and growing divisions between Brussels and Washington make a unified response harder. The fighting is “a test of how well Washington and Europe will coordinate” when faced with a crisis, said Franklin Holcomb from the Institute for the Study of War.
A major point of contention are the sanctions that the United States and Europe slapped on Moscow for its 2014 invasion of Ukraine and annexation of Crimea. If Washington were to end its participation in the sanctions — as Trump has hinted — European resolve will likely crumble, handing a major diplomatic and economic win to Putin.
So far, some Trump administration officials are publicly presenting a business-as-usual line on Russia. On Monday, new U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley made her first round of calls and visits with U.N. colleagues, speaking with representatives from Israel, the U.K., France, and, notably, Ukraine. She reaffirmed U.S. “support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine,” according to a release from her office.
It’s not just Ukrainians who wonder about U.S. resolve in the face of a Russian challenge. American and German tanks — along with thousands of other NATO troops — are taking up positions in NATO’s Baltic countries to reassure locals nervous about the prospect of Russian aggression. The temporary deployments were planned during the Obama administration, but could now be cut back.
During the campaign, Trump harshly criticized U.S. troop deployments in Europe, saying that the Europeans should pay for their own defense. The U.S. rotation of 4,000 troops and 90 tanks to Eastern Europe is funded out of the $3.4 billion European Reassurance Initiative, a fund that could find itself in the crosshairs of Trump and his incoming budget director Mick Mulvaney, who wants to save money by slashing the Pentagon’s spending on overseas deployments.
If the fund there slashed, it would represent “a major breach of solidarity” with Europe, Vershbow said.
“The Russians would see that as a bonanza that they would try and exploit by convincing countries like Bulgaria and the Czech Republic that the U.S. couldn’t be counted on.”'