United States Flag in Distress

United States Flag in Distress
We are not OK

Family Crest

Family Crest
Motto: I will never forget. [ Source HouseofNames ]

HUMANITY DOOMSDAY CLOCK - Moves forward to 2125 due to election of US President trump.

Estimate of the time that Humanity will go extinct or civilization will collapse. The HUMANITY DOOMSDAY CLOCK moves forward to 2125 due to US President trump's abandonment of climate change goals. Clock moved to 90 seconds to doom at December 2023. Apologies to Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists for using the name.

PLEASE QUOTE, COPY and LINK

While this material is copyrighted, you are hereby granted permission and encouraged to copy and paste any excerpt and/or complete statement from any entry on this blog into any form you choose. In return, please provide explicit credit to this source and a link or URL to the publication. Email links to mckeever.mp@gmail.com

You may also wish to read and quote from these groundbreaking essays on economic topics with the same permission outlined above

The Jobs Theory of Growth [https://miepa.net/apply.html]

Moral Economics [https://miepa.net/moral.html]

Balanced Trade [https://miepa.net/essay.html]

There Are Alternatives to Free Market Capitalism [https://miepa.net/taa.html]

Specific Country Economic Policy Analyses - More Than 50 Countries from Argentina to Yemen [https://miepa.net/]




Translate

Friday, November 7, 2025

YES, We Can Claw Back Money from POTUS



How can we claw back money from gifts or theft by the President
ChatGPT said:

That’s a really good — and serious — question. The process of “clawing back” money or assets given away, stolen, or misused by a sitting or former President depends on what exactly happened (e.g., illegal gifts, embezzlement, misuse of public funds, or corruption).

Here’s how it generally works in the U.S.:


1. If public funds were stolen or misused

  • Department of Justice (DOJ) and Office of the Inspector General (OIG) can investigate and bring civil recovery actions or criminal charges.

  • The U.S. government can sue to recover funds (for example, under the False Claims Act or other restitution statutes).

  • If convicted of a crime like theft or fraud, the court can order restitution — repayment of the stolen money.


2. If the President received illegal gifts or emoluments

  • Under the Foreign Emoluments Clause and Domestic Emoluments Clause, the President cannot personally profit from gifts or payments from foreign governments or the U.S. government beyond their salary.

  • Congress can demand the return of such funds, and the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) or General Services Administration (GSA) may step in to reclaim physical gifts.

  • Civil lawsuits (including by Congress or watchdog organizations) can seek disgorgement — forcing the return of improperly obtained gains.


3. After leaving office

  • A former President can still face criminal and civil liability for actions while in office (as reaffirmed in multiple court rulings).

  • The DOJ, or private plaintiffs in some cases, can pursue asset recovery, fines, and civil forfeiture.

  • If foreign assets or shell companies were used, the Treasury Department and FBI can coordinate with international partners to seize or repatriate funds.


4. Political accountability tools

  • During office: Impeachment is the main mechanism for removal or sanction for misconduct.

  • After office: Congressional investigations can expose wrongdoing and refer matters to the DOJ or state attorneys general.


Examples from history

  • Richard Nixon had to return public gifts and pay back campaign funds after Watergate.

  • Donald Trump’s emoluments cases (though unresolved before he left office) set precedents for civil recovery efforts.

  • State-level prosecutions (like those involving fraud or tax violations) can also recover money even from a former president.


If you want, I can outline the legal steps Congress or the DOJ would need to take right now to reclaim funds in a specific scenario (e.g., “foreign gifts accepted by a president” or “funds misused from a campaign or public budget”).

Would you like me to break it down that way? 

Thursday, November 6, 2025

Our Future - Mamdani and Hope



November 5, 2025  


Heather Cox Richardson


New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, a member of both the Democratic Party and the Democratic Socialists of America, began his victory speech last night with a nod to Eugene V. Debs, labor organizer and Socialist candidate for president at the turn of the last century.


“The sun may have set over our city this evening, but as Eugene Debs once said: ‘I can see the dawn of a better day for humanity.’”


The 34-year-old mayor-elect’s speech went on to deliver something that was more than a victory speech. It marked a new era much like the one that had given rise to Debs himself. After more than forty years in which ordinary Americans had seen the political system being stacked against them and, over time, forgotten they had agency to change it, they had woken up.


Mamdani began by lifting up New York City’s working people, noting that “[f]or as long as we can remember,” they “have been told by the wealthy and the well-connected that power does not belong in their hands…. And yet,” he said, “over the last 12 months, you have dared to reach for something greater.”


“Tonight,” he said, “against all odds, we have grasped it. The future is in our hands.” New York, he said, had delivered “[a] mandate for change. ​​A mandate for a new kind of politics. A mandate for a city we can afford. And a mandate for a government that delivers exactly that.”


Mamdani thanked “the next generation of New Yorkers who refuse to accept that the promise of a better future was a relic of the past.” And that was the heart of his message: that democracy belongs to ordinary people. “We will fight for you,” he said, “because we are you.”


He thanked “Yemeni bodega owners and Mexican abuelas. Senegalese taxi drivers and Uzbek nurses. Trinidadian line cooks and Ethiopian aunties.” He assured “every New Yorker in Kensington and Midwood and Hunts Point” that “this city is your city, and this democracy is yours too.”


Mamdani celebrated the hard work of democracy in his win. It was a victory not just for all those who make up New York City, he said, but also for “the more than 100,000 volunteers who built this campaign into an unstoppable force…. With every door knocked, every petition signature earned, and every hard-earned conversation, you eroded the cynicism that has come to define our politics.”


With that base of Americans engaged in the work of democracy, Mamdani welcomed a new era. “There are many who thought this day would never come, who feared that we would be condemned only to a future of less, with every election consigning us simply to more of the same,” he said. “And there are others who see politics today as too cruel for the flame of hope to still burn.”


But in New York City last night, he said, “we have answered those fears…. Hope is alive. Hope is a decision that tens of thousands of New Yorkers made day after day, volunteer shift after volunteer shift, despite attack ad after attack ad. More than a million of us stood in our churches, in gymnasiums, in community centers, as we filled in the ledger of democracy.”


“And while we cast our ballots alone, we chose hope together. Hope over tyranny. Hope over big money and small ideas. Hope over despair. We won because New Yorkers allowed themselves to hope that the impossible could be made possible. And we won because we insisted that no longer would politics be something that is done to us. Now, it is something that we do.”


Mamdani promised a government that would answer to the demands of the people. It would address the city’s cost-of-living crisis, invest in education, improve infrastructure, and cut bureaucratic waste. It would, he said, work with police officers to reduce crime while also defending community safety and demanding excellence in government.


Mamdani pushed back not just against the smears thrown his way during the campaign, but also against the deliberate division of the country that has been a staple of Republican rhetoric since 1972, when President Richard Nixon’s vice president Spiro Agnew embraced his role as the key purveyor of “positive polarization.” In its place, he called for community and solidarity.


“In this new age we make for ourselves,” Mamdani said, “we will refuse to allow those who traffic in division and hate to pit us against one another…. Here, we believe in standing up for those we love, whether you are an immigrant, a member of the trans community, one of the many Black women that Donald Trump has fired from a federal job, a single mom still waiting for the cost of groceries to go down, or anyone else with their back against the wall. Your struggle is ours, too.”


Mamdani, who is Muslim, promised to “build a City Hall that stands steadfast alongside Jewish New Yorkers and does not waver in the fight against the scourge of antisemitism. Where the more than 1 million Muslims know that they belong—not just in the five boroughs of this city, but in the halls of power.”


He called for a government of both competence and compassion. “For years,” he said, “those in City Hall have only helped those who can help them. But on January first, we will usher in a city government that helps everyone.”


Mamdani took on the problem of disinformation in modern politics, noting that “many have heard our message only through the prism of misinformation. Tens of millions of dollars have been spent to redefine reality and to convince our neighbors that this new age is something that should frighten them.” He laid that disinformation at the feet of the very wealthy in their quest to divide working Americans to make sure they retain power. “[A]s so often occurred,” he said, “the billionaire class has sought to convince those making $30 an hour that their enemies are those earning $20 an hour. They want the people to fight amongst ourselves so that we remain distracted from the work of remaking a long-broken system.”


Mamdani urged New Yorkers to embrace a “brave new course, rather than fleeing from it.” If they do, he said, “we can respond to oligarchy and authoritarianism with the strength it fears, not the appeasement it craves.”


Mamdani identified the popular momentum to defeat President Donald J. Trump, but made the point that the goal is not simply to stop Trump, but also to stop the next Trump who comes along. While Mamdani’s prescription focused on the avenues of resistance open to New York City government, he emphasized that for the president “to get to any of us,” he will have to “get through all of us.”


Mamdani called for New Yorkers to “leave mediocrity in our past,” and for Democrats to “dare to be great.” When Mamdani said, “New York, this power, it’s yours,” and told New Yorkers, “[t]his city belongs to you,” millions of Americans heard a reminder that they, too, are powerful and that the government of the United States of America belongs to them.


Mamdani won election yesterday backed by just over half the city’s voters, in an election characterized by extraordinarily high turnout. Andy Newman of the New York Times noted yesterday that in the last four New York City mayoral elections, fewer than a third of registered voters turned out. Yesterday, more than 2 million voters voted, the highest turnout for a mayoral election since 1969.


And that turnout is a key part of the story of yesterday’s Democratic wave. As Mamdani said, American voters appear, once again, to be aware of their agency in our democracy.



Notes:


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/05/zohran-mamdani-victory-speech-transcript


https://www.thecity.nyc/2025/11/04/record-voters-ballots-cast-mamdani-cuomo-sliwa/


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/04/nyregion/nyc-mayor-election-turnout.html 

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

The Jack Smith Case Against Trump


By POLITICO Staff

10/02/2024 05:55 PM ED


U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan released to the public on Wednesday 10/02/2024 a redacted version of an important court filing from special counsel Jack Smith in the federal election case against Donald Trump.


Read the entire filing here: